Someone said Bennett said one thing. I merely pointed out that he recanted.
I believe I was the only person who mentioned Bennett, and only to say that Onaka confirmed to him that the HI BC is non-valid. Bennett’s own opinion is neither here nor there; what matters is what Onaka revealed in that legal document for Bennett: specifically that the HI BC is non-valid and so the State of Hawaii can’t verify ANY birth facts for Obama.
Which makes no sense if Obama was really born at Kapiolani as claimed on the document. So it is a HUGE leap of blind faith if ANYBODY believes that Obama really was born in Hawaii at this point, but especially for Bennett who was told point-blank that the State of Hawaii is legally prohibited from vouching for that claim. Personally it is a leap of faith. Legally and professionally, it is a violation of the Constitution’s Full Faith and Credit Clause. What documentation does Bennett have, to overrule the record of Hawaii?