Posted on 11/23/2012 9:21:06 PM PST by Steelfish
It would seem to me that the San Diego County Board of Supervisors would have more pressing problems than the lack of “diversity”.
My hometown.
GAG.
” And he’s a gay, married father of five.”
Hell; he reminds me of the HOMOPOTUS!!!! Married and the “father” of two!
He’s not “married.” He’s shacked up with another homo and pretending to be married; but married he’s not.
Heterosexuality had to happen somewhere in his life for him to become a father of one let alone five.
Ahh, Perversity, it’s a wonderful thing...
Nope, they’re adopted.
>> He’s also gay
When the “gay” flag is raised, is the intent to elicit mental images of one male sticking his penis up the rectal cavity of another male? Are tap shoes involved?
Which means heterosexuality had to occur somewhere in these children’s biological parents’ life. I’m still waiting for the evidence that either two males can reproduce a child without a female or that two females can reproduce a child without a male.
When I saw the name and “San Diego” I thought of baseball player Dave Roberts (who later went to SD?) of the Red Sox in 2004. His stolen base in game 4 started it all. If that didn’t happen, the Red Sox would not have gone on to beat the Yanks in games 4, 5, 6, and 7 (and then win their first WS since
1986 when they swept STL).
So, different one...
(game 4 of the ALCS I mean)
I really didn’t need to read that. Bad visual.
If that isn’t bad enough, the mayor race was between a queer Republican and a communist democrat and the communist, Filner won!
Number one. Be honest in reporting.
The man is not “gay”, he is a homosexiual
I find most folks in public life are particularly protective of their children NOT being on camera. In this case, it seems to matter that they are.
Then the kids were foster children, later adopted by two homosexuals.
While some foster parents are very good, there are those who are very bad. Who knows? (not enough information).
The "parents" the children have now are adoptive, not a biological parent of the children, which was my point. In this instance, "Parent" is a legal designation, not a biological one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.