Which means heterosexuality had to occur somewhere in these children’s biological parents’ life. I’m still waiting for the evidence that either two males can reproduce a child without a female or that two females can reproduce a child without a male.
Then the kids were foster children, later adopted by two homosexuals.
While some foster parents are very good, there are those who are very bad. Who knows? (not enough information).
The "parents" the children have now are adoptive, not a biological parent of the children, which was my point. In this instance, "Parent" is a legal designation, not a biological one.