Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

And Both parties involved,...last three presidents also.
1 posted on 11/21/2012 10:50:25 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Nachum; blam

Sometimes Nutting has more than “Nutting to say”...


2 posted on 11/21/2012 10:51:54 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

No offense to you, but who cares what Rex Nutting thinks, he claimed Bush was responsible for Obama’s stimulus.


3 posted on 11/21/2012 10:52:35 AM PST by Perdogg (Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA4) for President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Arthur Laffer #1??? What a load of BS

Laffer is enemy #1 for leftists. His theories are antithetical to everything that central planners, Socialists and Keynesians believe. That’s why they will never miss a chance to criticize him.


5 posted on 11/21/2012 10:54:04 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

This author is a nutter.

He hates cutting taxes as much as a Leftist.


6 posted on 11/21/2012 10:59:23 AM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Greed for low taxes

Nutter is a dumbass.

9 posted on 11/21/2012 11:04:15 AM PST by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Nutting is a nut case.

His understanding of economics (or at least the understanding he tries to express) is a barely-at-the-surface understanding and his political sense of economic issues has been delivered up to him by the media and populist ideas it creates.

WSJ should fire him. He represents a disservice to their reputation (even though it has been sliding down, and to the Left, ever since Murdoch bought it).


11 posted on 11/21/2012 11:05:56 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

He blames GWB the most, and says that the tax cut in 2001 didn’t work. He didn’t mention that the tax cut in 2003 DID work. He is a moron.


13 posted on 11/21/2012 11:12:36 AM PST by gman4bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Rex Nutting - apply-named king of the morons - he’s the jackwad Ann Coulter took to the woodshed for claiming W was responsible for Obama’s deficit record.

No surprise that most of the folks he includes in his list are conservative-leaning, including Art Laffer, Grover Norquist, and George Bush, among others. He does include Bubba and the Bamster, but is clearly less disturbed by them than he is by anybody on the right with even an ounce of sense.


14 posted on 11/21/2012 11:13:30 AM PST by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

“In every case over the last 60 years, major tax cuts have more than paid for themselves. In fact, every major tax cut since JFK has been followed by substantial increases in revenue, not to mention solid economic growth. Moreover, total federal revenue rose at a faster rate after each of those tax cuts than it did before them. Anyone can confirm these basic facts for themselves by checking federal budget data and economic indicators before and after major tax cuts (see, for example, Federal Budget Data,Data 360 Unemployment U.S.,and Total Economy Database). Let’s take a closer look at the results of the last four major tax cuts (and then for good measure we’ll examine the Mellon tax cuts of the 1920s).

Bush Tax Cuts: President George W. Bush’s 2003 tax cuts generated a massive increase in federal tax revenue and were followed by 52 consecutive months of economic growth. From 2004 to 2007, federal tax revenue increased by $780 billion, the largest four-year increase in American history. Total federal revenue from 2003 to 2007:

2003 — $1.78 trillion

2004 — $1.88 trillion

2005 — $2.15 trillion

2006 — $2.40 trillion

2007 — $2.56 trillion

Total federal revenue for 2008 dropped slightly, down to $2.52 trillion, because a recession started that year, but revenue was still substantially higher than it was in 2003 or 2004. During the same period, income tax revenue rose dramatically, going from $925 billion in 2003 to $1.53 trillion in 2007. As with other types of federal revenue, income tax revenue dropped slightly in 2008, down to $1.45 trillion, due to the fact that a recession began that year.”

http://www.mtgriffith.com/web_documents/taxcutfacts.htm


18 posted on 11/21/2012 11:21:04 AM PST by cruise_missile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

He forgot Dodd and Frank. Sorry, but my bs meter went off the minute I saw that smug arrogant face.
The man is as clueless as Krugman.


20 posted on 11/21/2012 11:21:46 AM PST by Wiser now (Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

This is DRIVEL!


23 posted on 11/21/2012 11:26:06 AM PST by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
A website article that has one paragraph per page in order to maximize their ad revenue by having you "view" all of those ads on all of those pages coupled with Art Laffer as villian #1 and saying "There’s only one problem: Laffer’s ideas didn’t pan out in practice: Tax cuts don’t pay for themselves. Tax cuts are a major cause of our $16 trillion national debt."

What a joke. I didn't read past there.....

25 posted on 11/21/2012 11:35:50 AM PST by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Anyone who thinks that the Congress is going to arrive at an agreement to avoid the fiscal cliff. Barring an EO from zero that circumvents the Congress (AGAIN!), they will not agree on the measures necessary to avoid the looming economic disaster in 2013.

If the Senate hasn’t produced a budget in 3 years, they aren’t going to be able to do this in 5 weeks . . . . . . . . unless Boehner cries and caves . . . . . . AGAIN!!

(Boehner is a primary reason that I no longer support the RNC. BUT - he’s only one of many!)


27 posted on 11/21/2012 11:49:22 AM PST by DustyMoment (Congress - another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The author is nuts. Cause #1 for the fiscal cliff is the legally responsible party.

That would be Congress.

Starting with the loss of Congress in Bush's presidency until now Congress has spent like a payday soldier at Octoberfest.

It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.
It's the spending, stupid.

28 posted on 11/21/2012 11:51:44 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: everyone

Sure

29 posted on 11/21/2012 11:58:04 AM PST by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Greed for ... a strong military

Being in favor of a strong military is now considered "greedy"? How can anyone write that sentence and not realize that they are a complete idiot?
31 posted on 11/21/2012 12:31:38 PM PST by jjsheridan5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

somebody forgot the /s switch...


40 posted on 11/21/2012 1:43:11 PM PST by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The core economy wreckers are Dodd, Frank, the deceased killer of Mary Jo, Pelozi, and any other tax and spend Socialist who has spent DECADES as an elected member of the Legislature.


53 posted on 11/21/2012 4:57:17 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The author is wrong about almost everything he says. He knows nothing about economics and just says stupid things.

Real 10 people.

1. LBJ- Combined social security revenues with the general fund and ensured social security would be unsustainable. Created social programs with no thought of how spending would increase and how to pay for it.

2. Democrat congress of 1970’s- created budget process that prevented president from controlling spending. Made budget process ensure budget would not be balanced.

3. Jimmy Carter- Began first deficits during periods of prosperity. Deficits started in mid 1970’s as president lost control. Carter created huge deficits and brought social security close to insolvency. Promoted loans to Communist and 3rd world countries that were not repaid and caused other problems. Created a legal and regulatory climate that crippled American industry and brought about an uncompetitive situation in the late 1970’s when U.S. industries could no longer compete.

4. Speaker Wright, Tip O'Neil and others- fought attempts to control Federal spending and get entitlement spending under control.They also promoted S and L fraud which required billions of taxpayer money to bail out.

5. Bill Clinton - Began interpreting and enforcing the Community Investment Act to require banks to make bad loans. The so called Clinton Surpluses never existed in real life. They were a result of the short-term Dot.com stock bubble that created huge capital gains tax revenue.

By 2007 the budget deficit was a small percentage of GNP the economy could have produced a balanced budget.

6. Barney Frank and the others - encouraged bad mortgage loans and prevented the regulatory oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which created billions in sub prime and fraudulent mortgage loans which went bad.

7. Nancy Pelosi - Became speaker in 2007 and immediately began destroying the economy increasing spending. In less than 2 years the economy was dying.

8. Harry Reid- Prevented fiscal responsibility since he became Senate leader in 2007. Did not complete a single budget since 2008.

9. Barack Obama - Created the first multi-trillion dollar deficits in history. Increased Federal spending dramatically. Created an anti-business environment that made economic growth impossible.

10. George Soros - Backed the Democrat Party and pushed for irresponsible spending. Undermined the American Economy.

The so-called fiscal cliff is just the Democrat Party and the government “running out of other peoples money” to paraphrase Mrs. Thatcher. The fiscal cliff is just the irresponsible spending of the last several years becoming unsustainable.

55 posted on 11/21/2012 10:08:16 PM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson