Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ohioan

It was disallowed because it wasn’t submitted on time for certification. It showed an approximate gain of 260 votes for Murphy, but it was so tainted with anomalies and glitches it was highly suspect in terms of accuracy.


34 posted on 11/20/2012 10:29:36 AM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: smoothsailing
Thanks! But what about that initial partial recount, that led to a several hundred vote swing, out of a small sample, to West?

Secondly, is the State investigating the possibility of actual criminal activity in the County, where the suspicious count took place? I can understand the Congressman's decision, based upon the information his lawyers obtained. But if there were a couple of hundred fraudulent votes, or deliberately miscounted votes, the State ought to investigate fully. That is another question, altogether.

William Flax

40 posted on 11/20/2012 11:03:42 AM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson