[ksen]

“he will tend to the rise of economic inequality”

In order to equalize economic conditions of people,
you MUST, UNAVOIDABLY, punish the successful and reward the slothful.

Our side is simply too polite to call them on this sound bit.

---

Maybe it’d help you guys win more elections if you’d stop falsely labeling those who haven’t been that successful as being “slothful” and “lazy”.

YMMV

[supercat]

Maybe it’d help you guys win more elections if you’d stop falsely labeling those who haven’t been that successful as being “slothful” and “lazy”.

For "successful" substitute "industrious". Those who are trying to be successful, but aren't, are probably not slothful but rather are among the industrious people whom the leftists seek to punish.

[MrB]

If I were a democrat debate coach, I’d give you an “A” for good democrat argument redirection technique.

I didn’t refer to the unsuccessful as slothful and lazy.
I referred to the slothful and lazy as slothful and lazy.

A good democrat, of course, would convolute the argument to divert away from the truth of the statement that

equalizing economic conditions inherently involves the unavoidable punishment of good choices and the rewarding of poor choices.