Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich on Romney’s ‘gifts’ comments: ‘It’s nuts’
Yahoo News ^

Posted on 11/18/2012 12:15:36 PM PST by Windy City Conservative

"It's nuts," Gingrich told guest host Martha Raddatz on ABC's "This Week" on Sunday. "First of all, it's insulting. This would be like Wal-Mart having a bad week and going, 'The customers have really been unruly.' I mean, the job of a political leader in part is to understand the people. If we can't offer a better future that is believable to more people, we're not going to win."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: brilliant; gifts; gingrich; mittissoreloser; newt; newtgingrich; nuts; romney; romneywastheproblem; rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-125 next last
To: lexington minuteman 1775
Newt has not changed the theory that the government is growing too big with welfare recipients..he is complaining about Romney making excuses. Rush stirred up many groups. Rush needs to promote conservatism not be loyal friends with the republican establishment. Rush should never called that girl a slut while making that one issue a political football getting the economy off of the issue. Romney needed all of the political help that he could get. imo.
61 posted on 11/18/2012 1:47:20 PM PST by Christie at the beach (I like Newt. As another FR member says..Obamas are living in gangster paradise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach
Why is it that the Dims circle their wagons against their "accused" or one potentially in the wrong, and Repubs eat their own?

Regardless on ones opinion of whether or not Romney or Gingrich/Insert Name was right...I'm tired of this double standard.

62 posted on 11/18/2012 1:49:34 PM PST by Jane Long ("Miss me yet?" - Mitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Windy City Conservative

Actors. Gigs. These TV “guests” must say something that’ll get some-a-use excited if they want to be invited again and... paid. It’s shoe biz, after all. Someone wrote recently and negatively about “entertainment” jocks such as Rush Limbo and others worshipped here, and got destroyed on these pages, not for the negative view of them, I reckon, but for the word “entertainment”.

As for Romney, he should have said something earlier, should have exposed Obamao’s shananigans during the campaign, during the debates when it counted, but he ran not to lose, or perhaps not to lose big. And lost.


63 posted on 11/18/2012 1:58:55 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll; All
Romney could NEVER bring himself to sell the conservative strengths involved in liberty and the responsible use of that liberty.

That's just what Romney tried to do. This election result wasn't a problem with Romney the candidate or his themes.

It was about turning voters out and many even here on FR refused to vote for the one man who could stop Obama from getting a second term in 2012. Some did so, proudly, because of ridiculous reasons like his Mormon faith or his prochoice comments decades ago. They threw a tantrum because it wasn't Santorum and returned the advocate of infanticide to the Oval Office.

Romney just couldn't win over enough people still 'shell shocked' by "Bush's fault" to overcome those who stayed home. He also had the "historical nature" of Obama's presidency to overcome although I think he was closer to doing it than we realize.

THOSE are the people who shoulder the blame here. So-called conservatives who are nothing but loud mouthed, holier-than-thou cowards. They will gleefully sabotage a victory for petty reasons.

Newt's right, and as you can see, many here don't want to hear what he's saying.

And here I am two weeks later still waiting for even one of the Akin apostles to apologize and admit to being wrong about his chances of winning in MO. Romney easily won, as he did in Indiana and at least two other states where the US Senate candidates fell short of his votes by 10s or 100s of thousands of votes. It wasn't a "GOPe" or Rovian conspiracy that sunk Akin or Mourdock, it was the arrogant, sanctimonious candidates themselves.

64 posted on 11/18/2012 1:59:28 PM PST by newzjunkey (Still waiting for Akin defenders to come clean and apologize... Romney 2016?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Windy City Conservative

Based on the ‘knee jerking’ to the Rommey gifts comments, I’d say there is some truth them.


65 posted on 11/18/2012 2:01:46 PM PST by AD from SpringBay (We deserve the government we allow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windy City Conservative

I am with Mitt all the way on this one. GtH, Gingrich.


66 posted on 11/18/2012 2:07:33 PM PST by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Gotta threesome here.....


67 posted on 11/18/2012 2:09:09 PM PST by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: chris37
->Mitt was right, except that it’s more than 47%.

We don't know for certain the % though, he should never divided the country before they voted. People took sides, don't you get it, politically. There is always fraud. That is why they say it's the party who brings out their base, will win. That is reality. We need the base next election or we are pretty much done.

68 posted on 11/18/2012 2:09:43 PM PST by Christie at the beach (I like Newt. As another FR member says..Obamas are living in gangster paradise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Windy City Conservative

Not to worry....the markets will solve all.....and God forfend us all when it decides to do so!!!


69 posted on 11/18/2012 2:11:02 PM PST by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne

I disagree. If nothing else, you turn off most women with anything but happy talk. Have you not observed that? And that’s before all the people the comments apply to.

At this point, there are more parasites and parasite sympathizers than producers. And that’s not going to change, so its all downhill from here. The only way it does change is if the System totally collapses. Then you will have a big shakeout in general, but especially among the naive Libs and anyone who depends on a Government handout to survive.


70 posted on 11/18/2012 2:11:51 PM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: chris37; All
The GOP is doomed because of people like yourself who only find fault with candidates willing to put themselves on the line year after year, break ground, achieve successes for causes you claim to believe in. Instead you belittle, you attack, you turn away at the quickest opportunity to protect what you see as the purity of your own personal piety.

The conservative movement is full of Judases and Pontius Pilate cowards.

Rather than embrace the writing on the wall that 'providential' candidate Todd Akin was a lost cause which everyone from Jim DeMint to Sarah Palin to Mark Levin to Karl Rove and Mitt Romney understood, they instead attacked these truth tellers and smeared them as abortion-loving, GOPe tools.

We have our own modern day Pharisees to battle.

Where's the acceptance they were wrong? Where's the apology? There is none. They go back into their bunker to self-congratulate and fling spears and arrows at those trying to defeat the radical Left while being flawed human beings in their effort.

And you'll see these types all over this thread. They are saboteurs, false conservatives and ultimately cowards.

71 posted on 11/18/2012 2:16:47 PM PST by newzjunkey (Still waiting for Akin defenders to come clean and apologize... Romney 2016?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pacpam

Nah, it’s worse than Adult ADD. I actually have that, and it causes me to misplace my car keys and forget if I’ve taken my supplemtns, but it doesn’t make one forget his princples.

That’s a far more dread disease. Patomac Fever.


72 posted on 11/18/2012 2:21:32 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright ("WTF?: How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost....Again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach

I think we are done Christie. With the GOP doing this idiotic move to the left, I can tell you that I see no need to support them.

With elected people saying we need to appeal to certain demographic groups...well, they are not appealing to me, so good luck to them, I suppose.


73 posted on 11/18/2012 2:23:08 PM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

“. . .if the System totally collapses. Then you will have a big shakeout in general, but especially among the naive Libs and anyone who depends on a Government handout to survive.”

IF??

When it collapses there will be a sea change and a paradigm shift, which has already occured for anyone with basic household economic sense. Living on borrowed money brings destruction of the system.

That Romney did not articulate that, brings us to where we are.

2016 will be tremndously different. Why didn’t Romney explain that?

Because he was not a Conservative running to help the country, maintain the Union, protect the Constitution.

He was going after the lib voters instead of giving up on the 47% that he should have done. Then forecast for them what is goin gto happen so that when it does, they won’t blame squishy B. Jindal, Newt, Romney, Bush republicans, which they will do.


74 posted on 11/18/2012 2:24:45 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

For your information, I supported Todd AKin, and I do not even agree with his position on abortion.

I supported him for having the balls to stand up for what he believes in.

I don’t support the GOP any longer, because the GOP no longer supports me or my country.

And if that means the democrats sweep elections, then so the hell what, that’s what they do anyway.


75 posted on 11/18/2012 2:25:55 PM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: All

We lost because it’s difficult to compete when our message, notably the correct one, is work hard, be frugal, work hard some more and put in extra hours, rise on your skills and talents. And their message is mean old Republicans don’t want you to have anything; here take an Obama Phone and we’ll tax the rich to pay for it.


76 posted on 11/18/2012 2:36:07 PM PST by navymom1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
.


There goes Gingrich. Notice the end of his quote. "If we can't offer a better future that is believable to more people, we're not going to win".

FUNG



==================================


The "FUNG" kinda threw me for a moment ... after spending too much time at Free Republic this year ...

I never encountered "FUNG".

Then I figured it must be an embittered MittBott, who also blames New Jersey's Gov. Chris Christy's "french kiss" with Obama (during hurricane Sandy) ...

in addition to the "free stuff" argument ...

that cost the GOP the historic opportunity to win the Glorious Trifecta ...
White House, Senate and House of Represenatives.

Unfortunately, Rush Limbaugh also parrotted (or invented) this LOUSY excuse for Mitten's loss.


==================================


Myth Romney and Karl Rove and Dick Morris ...

all together "lost" 2012 when they said ...


1) "Fork You" to the Tea Party Conservatives, especially at the 2012 Tampa Convention


2) "Fork You" when Karl Rove and that Limbaugh-Paid Quisling Mark Steyn (sp) despicably slandered Newt Gingrich AFTER Newt's LANDSLIDE UPSET of Mittens in South Carolina


3) "Fork You" ... with Extreme Prejudice ... to GOP Grass-Roots supporters of Christians Rick Santorum, Sarah Palin, Rick Perry, Herman Cain, Michelle Bachman and Newt Gingrich

.... who wanted ABR "Any But Romney" ...

while Santorum's Iowa Caucus Victory was STOLEN by that Shyster Myth Romney and his well-heeled pansy-ass gay-boy GOP E-RINO "election thugs"


==================================


That last thought brings me to THIS observation ...

All us GOP-Kiddies have heard this week is how the DESPICABLE DEMOCRATS ...

and their Corrupt SEIU Union Thugs ...

"stole" the 2012 Election for Obama ... after our boy "Myth worked so very, very hard" ... (insert crying here) ...



Well, Ladies and Gents ... MY QUESTION to the "sterling" PIECE-OF-MANURE executive GOP E-RINO leadership ...

is ...

WHERE THE HELL WERE YOU when ...

you allowed Myth Romney to STEAL the Iowa Caucus Victory from Santorum ?

you winked at the Romney's CHARACTER ASSASSINATION against Newt Gingrich in the Florida Primary ...

just because "daddy" Bush-41 was STILL PISSED at Newt ...

because Newt REFUSED TO SELL-OUT to "daddy" Bush-41's ...

trashing of his famous "Read My Lips, No New Taxes" promise ?


==================================


I indeed voted for the "Romney-Ryan" ticket in 2012 ...

"rationalizing" that at least one (1.00000) innocent child might be spared the Abortion Doctor's Murderous Hand ...

if Myth was elected instead of Obama.


==================================


Newt Gingrich is CORRECT in his political observations about why Mittens lost the election.

Was Obama's election fraud a part of the reason ? "Yes".

Were the free "Obama Cellphones" a part of the reason ? "Yes".



But the BIGGEST reason that Myth lost the 2012 election is that he told the ...

GOP Evangelical Tea-Party political base ...

to go "Screw Themselves in the Dark" ...

and then "put some ice on it" ...


Accordingly ...

"FUMR-Karl Rove-Mark Steyn (sp)"
"FUMR-Karl Rove-Mark Steyn (sp)"
"FUMR-Karl Rove-Mark Steyn (sp)"
"FUMR-Karl Rove-Mark Steyn (sp)"
"FUMR-Karl Rove-Mark Steyn (sp)"



.
77 posted on 11/18/2012 2:37:45 PM PST by Patton@Bastogne (Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin will DEFEAT the Obama-Romney Socialist Gay-Marriage Axis of Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Windy City Conservative

Hey Newt, I love ya to death but Its the freebies stupid.


78 posted on 11/18/2012 2:47:08 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

To me, Romney was not geared within to balance leadership while promoting conservatism. He would had been better than Obama though millions could not vote for him. That is a powerful message to the GOP-e. Will they listen?! I don’t know, Chris. Many in the beltway are running scared; that their majority is being taken away.. so they are running scared. They should not do that. They should be proud to defend the conservative roots of this country. I am not saying we need to move to lie/promise to groups for votes. We need to show other diverse groups conservatism. If they come over, great-if not, don’t move away from your convictions. This can be done/advance a cause without losing your core beliefs. We do need to advance into other neighborhoods that are not particularly fond of us. Not to give away promises but to advance the ideas that we cherish. It can be done with the right man or woman. We do not have a national leader. Many don’t like Newt for the marriage thing though promote life to God in forgiveness. I don’t get the double standard there. I just want Newt ( a person like him as a reformer) to move the country back on the right track. It looks very heartbreaking to what people in power are allowing to occur to America. We are such a wonderful nation and set up by the rule of law. How can people teach others to respect the law when they cast aside the laws themselves. The elected repubs should be making an inquiry for Obama’s impeachment, will that happen? One representative should begin this..vs. being more concerned about reelection/job security. ( Mitt’s not all to blame no doubt here) Take care, Chris.


79 posted on 11/18/2012 2:49:06 PM PST by Christie at the beach (I like Newt. As another FR member says..Obamas are living in gangster paradise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

Nice summary. You will be stoned by the credulous cultists in due course for it.


80 posted on 11/18/2012 2:49:31 PM PST by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans. Don't read their lips. Watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson