To: SWAMPSNIPER
“After partially recounting some of the early voting results on Sunday, her office discovered that it had double-counted the equivalent of 799 votes in the Murphy-West race and named the wrong winner in Fort Pierce’s mayoral race.”
Wait a second... why are the same people who screwed up the first count trusted to do the recount? Tbat’s insane.
2 posted on
11/16/2012 6:03:33 AM PST by
Boogieman
To: Boogieman
They should bring in certified machines and an unbiased crew and recount EVERYTHING.
Nothing Gertrude Walker touches is reliable.
3 posted on
11/16/2012 6:06:38 AM PST by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: Boogieman
Except in the recount there will be a lot more people watching the recount and the recount officials!
Maybe even a few Republicans watching-I bet a good number of tea party people will be there
To: Boogieman
double-counted the equivalent of 799 votes in the Murphy-West race and named the wrong winner in Fort Pierce’s mayoral race.” Wow! Electoral fraud provably reversed the outcome of an election! If Big Media were anything other than the propaganda arm of the demonicRat Party, this would be national news.
16 posted on
11/16/2012 6:32:05 AM PST by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: Boogieman
This is just a snapshot of what is going on in hundreds of precincts around the country, I'm afraid.
31 posted on
11/16/2012 7:42:45 AM PST by
mo
(If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
To: Boogieman
It’s like Bush v. Gore all over again.
To: Boogieman; All
56 posted on
11/16/2012 10:10:31 AM PST by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
