Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek

“The court says the ban puts an extraordinary burden on those who have to mount a long expensive campaign if they want to protect it.”

WTFreak? Since when is a law upheld on the basis of legal fees? Tar and feathers was the founders response to BS like this.


50 posted on 11/15/2012 2:43:40 PM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (Obama being re-elected is the political equivalent of OJ being found not guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Brooklyn Attitude

Somewhere in there it got insinuated that it was a right. If so, then you don’t need this “legal expense” argument to kill the prohibition.


61 posted on 11/15/2012 3:28:00 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

Those smug little white “hipsters” around about to discover what America felt like during segregation. Liberals do not mess around in their love of hate whitey.


64 posted on 11/15/2012 3:37:42 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson