Romney was obviously terrible on the issues, rejecting the party platform on abortion and homosexuality was not a good thing.
Romney just lost to Carter the 2nd while we are on the verge of a depression and with low turnouts on both sides.
Evidently your post is flat out silly, or the campaign would have been "a great campaign", "solid on the issues". Your agenda sucks, and you have trolled enough on this thread, how about joining us over here?
MARK LEVIN: TEA PARTY ONLY THING THAT STANDS 'BETWEEN LIBERTY AND TYRANNY'
“Evidently your post is flat out silly, or the campaign would have been “a great campaign”, “solid on the issues”. Your agenda sucks, and you have trolled enough on this thread, how about joining us over here?”
You started over... that’s funny, going to try a new tact ?
My agenda ? I don’t have an agenda. Romney did run a great campaign... and he was solid on the issues.
You argument that he was not solid on social issues are your perceptions - my recollection of the race is that he gave a good response the Christian Right and Billy Graham. I contend that the social issues were not a factor when considering a postmortem of the race. And if their were people who actually decided to stay home for those reasons they most probably screwed themselves and their ideals as I explained earlier.
As far as coming over to your side - you are border line lib as far as I can tell. Your apparent disgust for Republicans is similar to what I hear on MSNBC. I tend not to insult my party and the people who participate in it but would rather try to effect change - I don’t see you doing that. You are more the supporting Obama type because you don’t like Romney.