You seem confused, this thread is a postmortem on Romney.
The election is over, you can quit campaigning for the most radical, leftist, anti-freedom republican in history, and engage in the the thread defending conservatism, and discussing Romney’s loss.
You don’t need to keep fighting for liberalism, this is about Romney’s loss, it is over for him.
“You seem confused, this thread is a postmortem on Romney.”
I don’t think I’m confused - I just don’t agree with assessment of the postmortem. I believe it is shortsighted and harmful to the conservative cause as a whole.
And I’ll quit campaigning for Romney when you quit campaigning against him, because yes Romney wasn’t the most socially conservative candidate the Repubs could have nominated, but he was nominated. And he didn’t lose because of your perceived liberal bias. Try to pay attention.
And yes, if it’s over for Romney I’d like to invite you to try to understand some other more plausible perceptions on why Romney lost instead of trying tear down a man who ran a race. Your assessment is silly. A postmortem is useful if you are honest and objective in looking at ALL the facts, not a just one that isn’t a fact but a perception based on a set of different political circumstances.
Lastly, I’m not fighting for liberalism, I’m fighting against Obama vs you who is tearing down Republicans and disenfranchising conservatives.... thereby supporting liberalism.
You’re going to get dizzy if you keep spinning....