To: Dilbert San Diego
The unspoken fact is whole secession question seems to have arisen after 0bama stole the election. If he were removed, then would the secession movement be stopped? Also, if a state secedes, certainly 0bamascare is null and void and is the state no longer obligated for it’s share of the $16 Trillion debt?.
37 posted on
11/14/2012 1:27:38 PM PST by
The Sons of Liberty
(Remember the Heroic SEALs of Benghazi and DEMAND a Full Accounting!!!!)
To: The Sons of Liberty
The unspoken fact is whole secession question seems to have arisen after 0bama stole the election. Oh, to the contrary. Secession is attractive because Obama won the election, which suggests that we are at a tipping point where the unproductive have complete control of the government and can no longer be resisted by the productive.
To: The Sons of Liberty
Obama’s not the problem, he’s the symptom and the result.
The problem is a bloated government that maintains its power by giving out freebies to people who vote for more freebies.
If not secession, then a strong application of the 10th amendment is necessary to provide a place where these freebies are not given out so freely, nor are the productive citizens penalized in order to provide them.
The sorting process would then begin.
48 posted on
11/14/2012 1:33:11 PM PST by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson