Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

What difference would it have made if the polls were accurate other than Romney would not have been surprised by the loss?


2 posted on 11/12/2012 5:34:58 PM PST by Arthurio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Arthurio

Right. LOL.


3 posted on 11/12/2012 5:36:21 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("I am the master of my fate ... I am the captain of my soul.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Arthurio

I think the story is saying he would have allocated his resources differently had he known he was behind.


4 posted on 11/12/2012 5:43:05 PM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Arthurio

No. That he wouldn’t have been blowing cash in PA or Michigan. flirt who never puts out. Lol

Based on the election, though, Romney had no chance sadly. Lazy and dumb people out numbered us.


5 posted on 11/12/2012 5:44:22 PM PST by smith288 (Peace at all costs gives you tyranny free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Arthurio

I suspect he played it safe in the last weeks in order to avoid losing a lead that he never actually had.

He seems to have spent the last six weeks of the campaign looking presidential and coasting to “victory”. If he realized he was losing, he might have been more aggressive—hit hard on Libya, etc. And he probably would have spent less effort mandate hunting (by winning PA, WI, etc) and more time focusing on states he needed to win.


7 posted on 11/12/2012 5:48:29 PM PST by MN Mitch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson