Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norm Lenhart

I will disagree. If the social issues had not been raised, Romney would have had a shot of capturing enough women on fiscal concerns to have had a shot of winning. As it stands, there was no positive motion of women toward Romney than McCain...


145 posted on 11/12/2012 5:25:55 PM PST by ace2u_in_MD (You missed something...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: ace2u_in_MD

That presupposes that women vote solely with their crotches.

If women did not vote for Romney, perhaps it’s a trust issue. In fact I would bet the farm on that. Sure the lib women DO vote vaginally. But conservative women do not. They value honesty. And the GOP/Romney as their records show beyond argument, is/are anything but.

So run more ‘election conservatives’ and get more women staying home? That’s not the answer. The answer is and always has been to give people something they WANT to vote for. The dems do that with liberal BS. It would work well for us.

Instead of trying to fear us into voting against the vorst ever gotta vote against him boogy man the dems are guarenteed throw up election after election.


146 posted on 11/12/2012 5:37:10 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson