Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tobyhill

Hussein needed the dirt on Petraeus cuz there were big-time rumors he’d emerge as Mitt’s VP nominee. If that had played out you can be SURE it would have been sprung on the electorate ONE WEEK before the election, right?

But Mitt didn’t make that choice, so they laid that card aside, and then lo and behold the Bengazi chit sandwich was served up nice and steamy:

They needed a fall guy, right? So in addition to the BS about the naaaasty YouTube video they were going to blame it on the CIA who is soooooo incompetant, right?

Why would they take on the freaking CIA of all entities? Reckless, huh? NOPE..! They had P4 all compromised in this honeytrap.

So OF COURSE Hussein knew for months..! What else do we not know?

I guess we KNOW Ryan is clean as a whistle cuz we heard nothing on him and you know Hussein sent out EVERY flying monkey in the kingdom, right?

For interesting reading check out the tactics Hussein used in Chicago when he first started out.

HE HAS BEEN DOING THIS FOR YEARS.


12 posted on 11/11/2012 2:47:21 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gaijin

This was clearly a Hussein/Chicago tactic. But it backfired so now I’m wondering if Petraeus (whom I have never liked, but who actually may have a shred of patriotism) forced the issue.

On another thread, it was pointed out that the real reason for the Benghazi attack, according to Petraeus’ sweetie, was because the CIA had a “secret prison” where they were holding two important Libyan AQ members. Some posters have said they were holding four.

In any case, it appears that even after killing the ambassador and parading his body around, AQ hadn’t managed to find and extract their people. But, if you recall the early accounts, the US forces had caught three or four high value targets...and were then ordered by Obama to turn them over to “Libyan security” and who have since disappeared.

So the only thing that would explain the Petraeus situation is that Obama was and is now desperately trying to cover up his actions and his loyalties, including by sabotaging Petraeus. The good general appears, like Clinton, to have had a long and dishonorable career in the sack, attractive only to careerist women who find power to be the ultimate aphrodisiac. Looking at Petraeus, there sure wasn’t anything else there, and since you were going to be only one of many girlfriends, I don’t think you could have believed you were the one and only striking his “soul.”

I think these two broads are going to be just the beginning of the revelations...but the important point is that I’m sure that the FBI, the CIA and practically your grandmother has known about all this for a long time, and it is being released now to keep Petraeus from testifying.

I think Petraeus, PC to the end, would have fallen on his sword for Obama, but I think Obama’s story is so flimsy that even hara kiri wouldn’t have helped.


23 posted on 11/11/2012 3:07:29 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: gaijin
Since Petraeus reportedly ended the affair when he was named head of the CIA, it seems to me that the DOJ may have known about it before Petraeus was named as head of the CIA.

If this was the case, don't you think this makes it smell all the more like a setup? Especially since Petraeus was originally chosen by Bush to lead the war in Afghanistan.

37 posted on 11/11/2012 3:52:11 PM PST by Sons of Union Vets (No taxation without representation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson