Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud

Townhall ^ | 11-11-12 | Rachel Alexander

[Kevin in California]

There were many factors that hurt Mitt Romney and favored Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election. The Democrats portrayed Romney in the worst light possible; as a wealthy, out of touch millionaire who wanted to return women to the 1800's.

[MomwithHope]

I just wrote to my House representative urging him to dump Boehner and get behins a real conservative with guts like West or Ryan. Next letter is to my secretary of state about voter fraud. We need to get rid of electronic voting and have paper ballots only. If you have electronic voting please do the same.

[erlayman]

Everyone is waiting I think to see what happens in the West case. More than citizen activism, the the supervisor of St Lucie county being convicted of stealing the election from West will spark an avalanche of complaints and investigations.

[castlegreyskull]

So one thing I wondered, was the Benghazi scandal will still be investigated. Is it possible the DNC purposely delayed the inevitable media coverage till after the election to get obama elected. Then if he gets impeached, at least they will still control the presidency?

[The Wizard]

I’m shocked, shocked....

[DJ MacWoW]

Don’t be so intellectually dishonest. Those two things are not opposites. Romney is a Republican, not a conservative. Vote fraud is a reality.

[Drew68]

Vote fraud is a reality.

Oh, I agree. And I believe vote fraud benefits Democrats. I just don't believe there was enough of it to swing the election. Obama could've given himself a 60 seat Senate majority or the House if this was the case. Voting laws are a state matter and need to be addressed to maintain the integrity of our political process. But Romney didn't lose because of vote fraud. Romney lost because conservatives stayed home (as so many on this forum told us repeatedly they were going to do).

Exit polls demonstrate that they weren't bluffing.

[DJ MacWoW]

You only need a few cities in 3 or 4 states to have over 100% turnout and you got it. You won. It doesn't have to be massive fraud, only "surgical" inserts.

Obama doesn't need congress. He's been bypassing them all along.

“You can have a president you love, but if you don’t have a Congress that’s willing to work, you know, you wind up stalled in so many ways,” First Lady Michelle Obama said Wednesday on Tom Joyner’s radio program.
“And I think that Barack has done a phenomenal job working around a Congress that has never been willing to help move the country forward on so many different issues...

[CincyRichieRich]

I do believe this happened, and of course, Soros’ $ funded it and it was years in the making.

That said, Boehner will never turn over the rock.

Tree fell in woods, not a sound was made.

We are peons here, and it’s great that Townhall has balls to cover this.

But, is there anyone of substance nationally as in MSM who will put the case together, with data, cohesively and coherently and make it nationally known? That person will be SNLed, scoffed at, ridiculed, called a racist, etc.

Will the truth EVER come out even years from now?

Will we realistically ever have another election or conservative, pro-US president?

Is our side smart enough to even nominate one and start re-educating Amerika using the Frank Luntz-like language we should start using?

[Venturer]

As far as I am concerned there isn’t a nickle’s worth of difference between the two.

Politicians from both parties are in it for what they can get out of it.

[ronnie raygun]

likley, AND WE ALL SIT BACK AND TAKE IT. Is there anyone in DC that has a pair of balls, pick up the voter fraud flag and run with it, you have an army out here waiting to march

[little jeremiah]

*

[KGeorge]

No question about it.

[Monorprise]

I actually think their underestimating the scale of the problem. There are many many ways to commit voter fraud and almost none of them are traceable after the fact due to “secrete ballots”.

As Joe Stalin once put it, it is not who casts the votes but who counts them.

Other than with registration we can’t actually go out and ask people who they voted for and check that with the nonexistent records. We have no way of knowing weather or not the votes were counted accurately.

This is in itself is a big source of fraud that statistically has to be in play in the larger city’s where they recorded 100% of the vote for Obama. But without access to theses machines & people we can’t prove anything, except site supposed mericals and produce agreved voters that don’t agree with their phony numbers.

All these things we have done in this & past elections only to be largely ignored by those who have stolen but nonetheless now hold the power.

Anther source of fraud that is very much more detectable is in voter registration. As you know the whole point of registration is to allow time to verfy that a voter is legally entitled to vote in this pariculary precient of this particular state. But that has been shot to hell with 1993 motor voter act which basically opened the floodgates to registration fraud & precistance everywhere in addition to making a mockery of the Federal Constitution(which grands no such powers to Washington to make any such domestic law).

But at least with registration It is possible to(although it is not generally done) go thou the records one by one and verify that everyone on that list is legally entitled to vote in the area and that area alone. We have no idea whether or not THEY personally did vote or whom they intended as apposed to actually voted for.

[Monorprise]

Recounts only help you if the ballots are all legitimate.

Frankly if you got people voting illegally, or votes are being casted or recorded illegally. Recounting bad ballots will still give you the same bad results.