Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
In some ways he's got it all wrong. Nowadays, especially in professional jobs that require a lot of skill and education, the trend is to have fewer employees work more hours, not the other way around.

If you have work that typically requires a professional staff to spend 120 per week getting the job done, you're better off hiring two employees and having them work 60-hour weeks than three employees with 40-hour weeks. You end up saving money even if you pay the two employees 50% more to compensate them for the extra time they work. For one thing, most employee benefits (sick time, vacation time, medical insurance (think about this in the context of Obamacare), etc.) are fixed costs regardless of how many hours someone works. Secondly, having two employees instead of three means you can get away with one-third less office space for the work.

51 posted on 11/11/2012 9:59:59 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("I am the master of my fate ... I am the captain of my soul.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Heck, I could do my job from home. I suspect we’ll see that more and more as companies try to save money on office space.


52 posted on 11/11/2012 10:01:12 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson