Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Manic_Episode
Aside from Benghazi I strongly suspect he didn't begin his affair on Tuesday and end it on Thursday.

I read another report that said the affair was ended in September of 2011, BEFORE he became CIA Director.

24 posted on 11/09/2012 8:02:48 PM PST by Brandonmark (OWCM is The new American Minority!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Brandonmark
I read another report that said the affair was ended in September of 2011, BEFORE he became CIA Director.

Which would have meant that the FBI investigation would have been included in any background check that was done when he was appointed to the CIA directorship, right?

It's a good thing that post is not terribly sensitive these days. I mean, when you've got that fat butch from Arizona serving as the Homeland Security Director, who would take any of them seriously?

34 posted on 11/09/2012 8:10:04 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Brandonmark

“the affair was ended in September of 2011, BEFORE he became CIA Director.”

I believed that from the git-go. I expect that every person working under/for Hussein had a skeleton in his closet before being brought on board. Hussein wouldn’t hire someone unless he has a tool (blackmail) to control and manipulate if the need arises. In Benghazi, “the need arose” in regard to Petraeus. Now all appointees know they’re walking time bombs, wondering what’s in their files.


140 posted on 11/10/2012 10:46:18 AM PST by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson