Posted on 11/09/2012 5:54:14 PM PST by dynachrome
(Excerpt) Read more at michaelsavage.wnd.com ...
You can get free Savage podcasts on KSFO tho only a week's worth.
That only one aspect of "comprehensive immigration reform" will be enforced.. amnesty. ILLEGALs will still pour in by the tens of millions -- and be welcomed and covered for until the next "comprehensive immigration reform" when they will be given amnesty. Repeat.
I am fond of posting a quote by Lincoln (slightly updated):
. . . You now have two Americas. In my opinion, it will not cease until a crisis shall have been reached and passed. "A house divided against itself cannot stand." [it won't fall but it has to] become all one thing, or all the other.
We are nearing that crisis and IMO our military has to choose sides.
We are. Barry is NO Lincoln.
I heard a black caller into Hannity the other day congratulate him for being a humble and magnanimous loser. Sean lapped it up.
Any criminal (IMHO), convicted of ID theft or fraud, fake age on their DL (for drinking), would have standing to sue the Govt. (state or fed) for unequal enforcement of the law.
Any Illegal that is here and been working is either: using fake docs (felonies), working under the table (tax fraud). There can be nothing else.
Those are felonies for you and I.
The key word is "loser."
I don’t have cable and I quit listening to his radio show about a year ago. (those screeching libs he has to have on to “balance”, shoot does MSM care about “balance”?) Sometimes I turn in on, and after a little bit, her comes Juan Williams and I shut it off. I don’t need the stress. Listen to Levin and Savage.
And there has to be already legal associations at work on the unequal enforcement. That'd be the 14th Amendment I believe. The lefties cling to that Amendment and the commerce clause.
I'll try to find something on the 'Net over the weekend.
Equal Protection Clause. I heard someone, on the airways say that for that you had to have “standing”. Get prosecuted first, then sue. (the DOJ, ACLU, Mexican Consulate and other various Countries that encourage their citizens to violate our sovereignty will file Friend of the Court briefs and a lib judge will throw it out).
Just to irritate them and to have it on the Public Record, if I had the extra money, I file a suit against them for a number of things. (i’m not a criminal just to make that clear).
I’ve always said DMX (dog abuser and convicted of fraud to giving a fake name at the hospital) could sue for the violation of his rights on the fake name enforcement (Federal suit, not against AZ). Here in AZ, Illegal Immigrants greatly impact the ER’s and can give a fake name/id and they don’t go after them.
I think someone asked Levin about that either having to do with Obamacare or Barry’s irregularities, and he (Mark) if I’m not mistaken, pooed the use of the Equal Protection Clause for that.
Illegal Immigrants and all the rest that are exempt from Obamacare is, IMHO, a violation of the Clause.
Guess you’ll have to go to the source, last time I heard, Savage mentioned he was on 144 stations and counting.
http://www.cumulus.com/listen/
Since local radio doesn’t have Savage anymore, I listen on the KSFO site. Listen to their news just now.
OMG, Cuomo (Gov) of New York was just saying that, “At one time New York didn’t have hurricanes, but now they do”. Is he just as stupid as Bloomberg? (he was climate-fear-porning)
Hispandering as Rush said.
on another thread, this was posted by snowislander
(Could be an explanation, but weird for a county to report that way, Broward didn’t, but? food for thought.)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2957810/posts?page=51#51
Each voter received two ballot cards — Florida had a large number of constitutional amendments proposed, and it required two ballots to cover all of the races and amendments.
The first two pages of the “Statement of Votes Cast” report are somewhat misleading when they show “cards cast” as exceeding 100%, and do not indicate blatant fraud. You should divide “cards cast” by two to get the number of voters participating.
51 posted on Friday, November 09, 2012 9:51:21 PM by snowsislander
, machogirl wrote:
sorry, these results are so shocking to me (St. Lucie more at link i posted)
Reg Cards % turnout
4815 6550 136.03%
1849 2352 127.20%
What is this ? Are these precinct results from St Lucie? And the results from the FL Sec of State ?
If so identify the precincts if possible .
on’t want to make an excuse for the Democrats here. Believe there could have been massive voting by illegals across the country. Will state for the record that St. Lucie has been one of the fastest growing areas in the country though population wise.
Got to post this to every thread re: St. Lucie. (these elections heads have months to prepare)
you all are going to laugh at this, but this IS the quote for the elections head for the county (real msm story, NBC affiliate)Ballots also “left” in a library.
Gertrude Walker, Supervisor of Elections for St. Lucie County, said she is not sure why the Election Summary Report lists “Cards Cast” as 141%. “They may have had something like that in Palm Beach County, but we’ve never seen that here,” she said.
From the county of St. Lucie elections. On a tablet, could only post a few. The explanation makes sense, but this elections head of the county was quoted saying she didn’t know why, by an NBC affiliate no less.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.