Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DustyMoment

How did 0bummer&Lib-DemsFromHell get a Spanish co involved in tallying votes? UN involvement? I thought it was up to each state to determine? I’m just hearing about this, Thur-Fri and today. WT-Heck? I never understood how the voting machine manipulation thing worked; I need to research the history of that. If you have any links, pls forward, DM.

Is this it: SCYTL?

https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=spanish+company+voting+machines&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&channel=suggest

Lots of articles at-odds with each other, there.


77 posted on 11/10/2012 11:15:54 AM PST by Carriage Hill (America - a great idea while it lasted... it's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: carriage_hill

TTBOMK, zero contracted with the Spanish company sometime this past summer. There were several DBM news items about it at the time. That’s where I got the info. The material you sent about SCYTL sounds like the same company. At this point, I would be the last person to verify that the information is true or false because I am going strictly by the information provided by a couple of DBM outlets that were posted on FR.

Secondly, in general, electronic voting machines have been fairly easily hacked from the time they were initially introduced into elections. This has always been a thorn in Republicans’ side because of the easier access for fraud. It is also the reason that I request a paper ballot whenever possible because the paper ballots tend to be more secure by providing an audit trail which the electronic machines don’t necessarily do.

Third, despite what Snopes says, we have to remember that zero has been a loose cannon for at least the past two years when he discovered that he could circumvent the Congress and legal proceedings by using the power of the EO. So, I do not doubt that it remains possible that he engaged in fraud via the Spanish company. They don’t have a dog in this fight so they win and he wins!

Finally, Snopes has engaged in some things that suggest that they are not as unbiased as we think they are -ESPECIALLY as it applies to Obama. They have either joined the cover-up that the DBM are engaged in when it it comes to all things Obama, or they simply overlook negative items related to Dear Leader. So, at this point, I’m not so sure that they are as reliably unbiased as they used to be.


78 posted on 11/10/2012 12:15:37 PM PST by DustyMoment (Congress - another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson