TTBOMK, zero contracted with the Spanish company sometime this past summer. There were several DBM news items about it at the time. That’s where I got the info. The material you sent about SCYTL sounds like the same company. At this point, I would be the last person to verify that the information is true or false because I am going strictly by the information provided by a couple of DBM outlets that were posted on FR.
Secondly, in general, electronic voting machines have been fairly easily hacked from the time they were initially introduced into elections. This has always been a thorn in Republicans’ side because of the easier access for fraud. It is also the reason that I request a paper ballot whenever possible because the paper ballots tend to be more secure by providing an audit trail which the electronic machines don’t necessarily do.
Third, despite what Snopes says, we have to remember that zero has been a loose cannon for at least the past two years when he discovered that he could circumvent the Congress and legal proceedings by using the power of the EO. So, I do not doubt that it remains possible that he engaged in fraud via the Spanish company. They don’t have a dog in this fight so they win and he wins!
Finally, Snopes has engaged in some things that suggest that they are not as unbiased as we think they are -ESPECIALLY as it applies to Obama. They have either joined the cover-up that the DBM are engaged in when it it comes to all things Obama, or they simply overlook negative items related to Dear Leader. So, at this point, I’m not so sure that they are as reliably unbiased as they used to be.
“...zero contracted with the Spanish company sometime this past summer.”
That’s still the point which has me stumped. How does *he* get to choose/contract the country’s voting machines? Fox/henhouse analogy here...
Lots of conundrums, here:
This article answers a few questions:
Net, net: we’ll probably never really know what actually happened.