Posted on 11/09/2012 10:02:38 AM PST by Zhang Fei
There is no substitute for recognizing the truth, and teaching it. The truth is that:
- journalism is leftist. It just is, and it is understandable only when you consider that journalists are mere critics who dont get things done, and socialism is the creed of the superiority of criticism over accomplishment.
- The only possible reason that journalists would temper their tendency to coddle Democrats would be competition among journalists to get the truth out - but there is no effective competition within journalism.
- Ideological competition within journalism is entirely suppressed for the simple reason that all major journalism is joined at the hip by the AP newswire.
- Academia has the same incentives as journalism does, and it is as ideologically homogeneous as journalism is. That makes it excruciatingly difficult to raise up succeeding generations of conservatives. But IMHO KhanAcademy.org may show the way. It is possible to create an entire curriculum independent of the public school system at dramatically less cost than the conventional classroom educational approach. But the point has to be to avoid teaching that journalism is objective, when that is not a necessary assumption and there is no proof of it, and plenty of historical evidence against it.
- Liberals and progressives are mere code words which are euphemisms for agreeing with journalists perspective, but not being working journalists. Journalists will accord its acolytes any positive label except objective, which it reserves to itself.
Obama was elected by Yankees (Race traitors in new-speak).
Most racially mixed people consider themselves non-white and vote accordingly. Many of the most lunatic black nationalists are half white.
The solution: business friendly “red zones” and benefit friendly “blue zones. Just like Hong hong China and PRC China. Let the blues stew in their filth.
A lot of the rebel Indian chiefs who fought the US Cavalry were half (or more) white. Call it hybrid vigor. Call it superior smarts inherited from their white forebears. They were Indian enough to be leaders of the Indian community, but also had the superior raw intelligence (IQ) necessary to beat out most of the full-blooded Indians competing for leadership positions. There's this fortune cookie saying "It is better to be the head of chicken than the rear end of an ox". That's why Obama sided with his black half. And he was lucky in that choice - it ultimately took him all the way to the White House.
Brilliant and succinct precis.
“Barack Obama wasn’t re-elected by blacks, Hispanics, or Asians, though they helped at the margins; he was re-elected by Yankees.”
Ain’t that the truth. Look at a map of the electoral results on Tuesday and compare it to a map of the US/CSA circa 1862. Nothing much has changed.
“Does the Republican Party have a future?”
God I hope not. But I suppose it’ll hang on for awhile longer. Just like the Whigs did.
However in the future as our numbers dwindle, white liberals will have to fall back to racial solidarity just to survive. In a country were whites are a minority, do you really think Harry Reid will be treated any better than Jim DeMint, hell no. All those white liberal hacks holding cushy no work jobs are going to be replaced with minorities. At that point they will become Republicans for the sake of survival. When you scratch beneath the surface, we are no different than the Sunnis in Anbar Province.
“Deliverance wasn’t just a movie - it was the encapsulation of every horrific fantasy citified Yankees have had about the South.”
Good point. Perhaps we should play up to their nightmares? I don’t speak with much of an accent and have to admit that I prefer a salad to BBQ most of the time. Maybe I should get that beat to death pickup truck with the rifle rack and stickers and go visiting the more toney areas up north?
“We can still win, but its getting harder and harder with less room for errors/misfortune on the part of our candidates.”
How do you define “winning?” Loose political power over disintegrating, bankrupt northern cities where we’re hated with a vengeance?
You’re making my point for me.
the key is to MANIPULATE THE MEDIA. Show them something they can’t ignore: NEW leadership. A NEW start. The public perception is refreshed.
RLTW
And then the GOP will still lose because then the Dems will be the party of the other 75%.
As I have been saying, there is no unity among white Americans. The old splits of education, class, sex, religion, city-country, and of course North-South still divide whites, and that is the basis of most of our politics. The Republican Party is white, sure enough, but whites aren't Republican. This will presumably be less and less the case as whites head for minority status. At some point the fact of impending minority status will sink in, and whites will begin to sink their differences and circle the wagons. At some point the Lee Kuan Yew principle will take over. I've quoted it before, and I'll quote it again, because it's very quotable in this context. Quote from Lee Kuan Yew, who was Prime Minister of Singapore for thirty years, and the power behind the curtain for a further twenty in that very successful city-state, quote:In multiracial societies, you don't vote in accordance with your economic interests and social interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion.
End quote.
From Zero Hedge, it appears that Singapore surpasses us not only in terms of average income, but also average wealth. And they appear to have surpassed us in average wealth a decade ago:
West was redistricted, as was Palin.
Akin was sandbagged by a question which was a "dog-whistle" for the slut vote: the centerpiece of Obama's strategy -- see also Stehpanopoulos and his questioning of Romney on contraceptives, the "vote with your lady parts" and "vote like it's your first time" ads, and so on.
Mourdock had to fight the GOP-e he was replacing, who gave him about as much help as Chris Christie gave to Romney despite Christie's being such an important speaker at the GOP National Convention, and the shunning of Palin and West there.
Not to mention the carpet bombing of Gingrich with negative ads, and jiggering with the Primary in Virginia and messing up the GOP state convention in Minnesota.
Conservatism can win, but not against a two-front war where one front is within the "big tent" (read : Quislings).
Ill add that people also vote or abstain in accordance with their intelligence.
Hmmm another sleeper liberal outs himself?
As minorities become the face of the Democratic party, whites will defect en masse. Once a pain threshold is reached, the 90% shift in the white vote to the GOP may occur overnight, in political terms. Think of all the white no-show or low-show jobs (Pelosi, Reid, Trumka) in government, unionized industries and charitable foundations and endowments being monopolized by blacks or Hispanics all down the line. Think of disparate impact lawsuits being filed against the current reality of all-white Hollywood productions, charitable foundations and endowments and other traditionally liberal white sectors of the economy, and racial quotas imposed that shut out large numbers of highly-competent and -productive white liberals. Why would a white liberal vote for the Democratic party ever again?
This is a pro-God, pro-life site. If you can’t respect that you can always leave. Push abortion on this site you’ll be pushed out.
What percentage of the vote total did the Constitution Party and Libertarian Party garner?
Because they want to show how tolerant and diverse-thinking they are.
You don’t get it - the problem is that by the time the GOP has 90% of the white vote, 75% of the people in the US won’t be white.
And I say that as an ex-liberal non-white who voted for Romney.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.