Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vote fraud alert: One out of five registered Ohio voters is bogus
Human Events ^ | 9/17/2012 | By: John Hayward

Posted on 11/07/2012 8:08:45 PM PST by Jet Jaguar

Vote fraud is no big deal, right? It hardly ever happens. It’s so rare that it’s not even worth discussing. Anyone who claims to take the integrity of our ballots seriously is cynically exploiting phantom fears for the purpose of suppressing the Democrat-loving minority vote.

To keep that silly narrative alive, it’s important not to read the Sunday edition of the Columbus Dispatch, in which readers were informed that “more than one out of every five registered Ohio voters is probably ineligible to vote.”

Furthermore, “in two counties, the number of registered voters actually exceeds the voting age population: Northwestern Ohio’s Wood County shows 109 registered voters for every 100 eligible, while in Lawrence County along the Ohio River it’s a mere 104 registered per 100 eligible.”

31 more counties report over 90 percent voter registration, which is a good 20 percent higher than the national average. The Buckeye State sure is civic-minded! Well, except that 1.6 million of the 7.8 million registered voters in the state haven’t voted in at least four years. So I guess they were civic minded, once upon a time. Never fear – I’m sure plenty of those “inactive” voters will reactivate themselves just in time for Barack Obama’s re-election.

You might think these astonishing statistics indicate a crisis-level voter registration problem requiring immediate attention, particularly since this is 2012, not 1912, and modern technology gives us extremely potent tools for accurately managing massive amounts of data. But Attorney General Eric Holder disagrees. Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted sent Holder a letter back in February, warning that “common sense says that the odds of voter fraud increase the longer these ineligible voters are allowed to populate our rolls… I simply cannot accept that.” Husted said existing federal regulations “limit Ohio’s ability to remove ineligible names, thereby increasing the chance for voter fraud.”

No one from the Justice Department ever responded. Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch, which called Ohio’s voter registration train wreck to Husted’s attention, is now suing him for failing to take action, beyond issuing a “directive” to remove ineligible voters that Judicial Watch describes as “all bark and no bite,” since there is no evidence that anything was actually done.

Judicial Watch has already filed a similar lawsuit against the State of Indiana, and says other states with disturbing levels of ineligible registered voters include Mississippi, Iowa, Missouri, Texas, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Florida, Alabama, California, and Colorado. Florida’s struggle to clean up its rolls, in the face of active hostility from Eric Holder’s Justice Department, has already made headlines.

Nationwide, the Pew Center for the States estimates about 24 million ineligible voter registrations, including “more than 1.8 million dead people listed as voters; about 2.75 million with voter registrations in more than one state; and about 12 million voter records with incorrect addresses, meaning either the voters moved or errors in the information make it unlikely any mailings can reach them.”

The National Voter Registration Act includes provisions “to ensure that accurate and current voter registration rolls are maintained,” but somehow that part of the NVRA doesn’t seem to count. It’s painfully obvious that we don’t have accurate and current voter registration – not even by the standards of the early Twentieth Century, let alone the early Twenty-First – but the only parts of the NVRA we ever hear cited are the passages that can be used as roadblocks against cleaning up the rolls, or keeping fraudsters away from the polls.

Without solid voter identification laws, every one of these phony registered voters presents an opportunity for fraud – and of course, Eric Holder is dedicated, above almost every other consideration, to blocking voter ID laws. And vote fraud on this scale is not a mess that can be cleaned up after the election. If a candidate wins a tough swing state like Ohio by, let us say, 5000 votes, and it is later discovered that 6000 false votes were cast in the election, the Presidency is not going to be taken away and given to the defrauded opponent. It’s not even like one of those sports scores that picks up an asterisk due to questionable circumstances. It won’t matter at all… except as another data point to be erased from the public mind, when vote fraud defenders crank up the machinery of fear and ignorance for the 2014 midterms and 2016 presidential campaign. And no one on the Left will express a single moment’s remorse for the legal voters who were disenfranchised by stolen ballots. They won’t have names and faces; no one will be paraded through media interviews to complain about the theft of his or her vote in a historic election.

Vote fraud must be prevented, not investigated after the fact. There is absolutely no logical reason for a computerized society to tolerate thousands of ineligible voters on its rolls. The state of Ohio is not a third-world banana republic. At least, it’s not supposed to be one. The sacrifice of national pride, and even self-respect, required to meekly accept counties with 110 percent voter registration is astonishing.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: fraud; holder; judicialwatch; ohio; votefraud; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last
To: N8VTXNinWV

Hi there N8, glad your son got to vote. This whole thing is sure a mess. I’m taking a little time to “cool down” a bit before I rejoin the battle. God bless America.


101 posted on 11/08/2012 7:25:19 PM PST by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

I hope to someday see a statistical analysis of the 99-100% Obama precincts in Philly and Cleveland.


102 posted on 11/08/2012 7:40:27 PM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

There was that same muted reaction in 2008 I observed. I think it had to do with blacks working in close proximity to whites and the blacks were unsure as to how to behave so they attempted to offer “olive branches” to test whites’ reactions.


103 posted on 11/09/2012 3:50:41 AM PST by mdmathis6 ("Barry" Xmas to all and have a rapaciously taxable New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: scrabblehack
I could download a voter registration file...names, ages, and voting history for the last 12 years.

Yes, that is all public record, and the data has been available electronically for years... The Obama campaign used every last byte of that data and harvested votes, maybe targeted fraud as well.

104 posted on 11/12/2012 6:22:06 AM PST by polstar123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; onyx

Now that the horse’s ass has disappeared over Capitol Hill, we will now discuss the nature of the locks that should have been in place on the stable doors.


105 posted on 11/12/2012 10:13:42 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Newt

Romney has no more cause, nor ability to persue an investigation of this than you or I.


106 posted on 11/12/2012 10:17:15 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gspurlock

>> “These facts do not align. How can we have longer lines at early voting and election day yet record 20,000,000 fewer votes cast?” <<

.
Easy. The Romney votes went in the trash can.


107 posted on 11/12/2012 10:19:26 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

>> “ I watched Kaisic on FOX tell us that they had the fraud issue covered stem to stern.” <<

.
Of course! - They had to be sure that it wouldn’t fail the prime directive of surpressing the undesirable votes.


108 posted on 11/12/2012 10:23:39 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

>> “And nobody is gonna do a damn thing about it.” <<

.
If you try, they’ll just tell you “You don’t have standing.”
.


109 posted on 11/12/2012 10:27:16 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RightLady

Kasich is a part of the problem.

He isn’t what he pretends to be, any more than Caroll O’Conner (”Archie Bunker”) was.


110 posted on 11/12/2012 10:32:25 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson