Posted on 11/07/2012 4:56:42 PM PST by drewh
havent seen anyone ask this yet, so I will: did the Ron Paul Revolution stay home last night?
Mitt Romney won 3 million votes less than McCain while Obama lost 10 million votes of his own from 2008.
Where did those 3 million McCain voters go?
The main part of why I believed Romney would win this time because I knew the 10 million Obama supporters would sit home but never in my worst nightmares did I imagine McCain voters would sit home. I counted on them to show up and bring friends this time to boot Obama out.
The only thing I can think of is this:
* Ron Paul supporters sat the election out because Dr. Paul because the conflict regarding the convention and the other delegate issues
* Evangelicals went through with their threat to sit home because Romney is a member of the LDS Church
And these two groups thought allowing Obama to have a second term was worth sitting home.
Is that what happened?
I never thought that was a realistic possibility because I cant imagine ever allowing the Left to not just maintain power but actually expand their reach but thats what happened last night.
Have you seen anyone crunching numbers to explain this today?
The Mainsream Media Ministry of Truth will say oh, it was all about Hispanics! but that is a red herring. That doesnt explain dropping three million votes below McCain and a total of five million votes from Bush in 2004.
Ron Paul supporters seem to explain that first drop from Bushs 2004 numbers, sitting out to the tune of 2 million when McCain ran in 2008 and then sitting out even more this time; perhaps its a combination of Ron Paul people and Evangelicals who sat home to teach everyone a lesson.
Thats an expensive lesson if this is right.
Add Loudon and Prince William in VA to that list... but even if we squeaked out wins in Va, Fl, and Oh, we still needed NH, IA, or CO.
From the voting data I have seen in NH your hypothesis is incorrect. They came out to vote, and often voted split ticket between Libertarian and Republican candidates. But their votes were swamped by Democratic votes from college towns and an army of people dependent on government who the Obama campaign found, misled into believing that the Republicans would harm their interests if elected, and then brought to the polls to vote.
What you read was that 32% of the electorate was republican. 38% was democrat.
We don’t yet know what percentage of the nation’s republicans turned out to vote.
my my area of northern michigan we had according to the ladies running the polls a larger turnout than they had ever seen before....and they weren’t voting for obama
I'm not sure it is a true stat. It was in a tweet I can't find anymore, however, of Romney's ~58M votes, we can't assume they are all Republicans..??..
Very possible. I was just thinking out loud. I just know a lot of paulbots from 08' and this time around and none of them would ever consider voting for the GOP nominee. Go read their forums and it is all about sabotaging the GOP. They were just trying to take over the Republican party because they know they can't win as a 3rd party. These people aren't real Republicans.
We had 85%.
One thing you can count on with the GOP-e is they will invariably leave it to the county committees to come up with new voters.
That means that from the last 'W" election to the one yesterday NOBODY running the party bothered to push voter registration drives!
The Democrats direct that drive from the top down! Ask Axelrod how he does it.
So, who stayed home? Could be the 2 million Republican voters who died or became disabled between 2004 and 2008, and the 3 million Republican voters who died or became disabled between 2008 and 2012.
Remember, you don't get people to vote Republican by appealing to undecided moderates in the middle (As I think Mitt described his targets)
You get people who will vote Republican by getting them to register, and then getting them to vote.
All of this should have been dealt with earlier ~ back in the George H W Bush years ~ when it would have counted.
I thought we lost Hamilton (Cincinnati) county by 5 points.
Thank you for getting this right. Sorry for the confusion.
Several leading politicians probably destroyed their own political careers.
The state of things—my daughter said in her high school (which is about 50 percent Mormon) the only issues her peers talked about were abortion, gay marriage and how Romney hates women. I wonder do these parents even converse with their kids, do they know that they “think” these are issues?
It's that simple ~ the missing voters equal the number of party registrants who die or become disabled over given periods of time.
DEMOGRAPHICS!
Further, he went out of his way to piss off the Paul supporters and the Tea Party Palin supporters.
So what do you expect?
Romney refused to allow the two most significant political leaders in the party, Ms. Palin and Congressman Paul to speak at the Convention where they would have done a much more effective job of attacking Zero's performance than either Romney or Ryan was able to do in the campaign. Would of cost him nothing.
Instead, he went out of his way to insult them. No real surprise they stayed home.
Second, many Reps have died over the past few years and the ranks are not being filled behind them. The number of non-Hispanic whites is declining each year as a percentage of the poplation. By 2019--just seven years from now--half of the 18 years old and younger will be minorities as defined by the USG. Each year a new wave a Democrats enters as voters.
Sounds like someone wants to keep the heat off the RINOs so the GOP elites can run another liberal in 2016. Romney won the primary “because he can win” and then he lost.
The conservative majority needs to agree on a nominee BEFORE the primary season so we can unite behind a candidate and win against the establishment liberal.
We lost because of demographics—simple as that. We have reached a tipping point as the Dems are on their way to becoming the permanent majority party. CA is the canary in the coal mine. The US will look like CA in 2050 demographically.
I don’t our our candidate sucked. I think he failed to motivate the more emotional voters. Mitt’s arguments were generally reasoned ones and presented in a clear way. What was lacking was an emotional component to the arguments. Regan was good at it. If we got better at it, that vision thing, we could motivate some of our adversaries to join us.
For national office like president, west wouldn’t get close if party bosses have their way... too conservative...
FL GOP not a fan of west either. guessing too much tea party in this uppity....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.