Sarc, I hope
Romney should have blew him away regardless.
It is a Romney failure and a failure for the Republicans to realize that they can’t win against a liberal candidate with a moderate.
The republican party needs disbanded.
“It is a Romney failure and a failure for the Republicans to realize that they can’t win against a liberal candidate with a moderate.”
It is true he just couldn’t make a solid case against Obamacare when he had to defend Romneycare. But I think in the end, debates don’t really matter and people just want their goodies.
Indeed; in real terms 'moderate' means "doesn't stand for anything."
Any candidate who actually stood for something good, say Ron Paul, would have had it... but, no, we have to blame voters for not voting the way we want. (After all, no opinion is valid unless it matches ours.) [/sarc]
The republican party needs disbanded.
Indeed; it does a good job talking about things... but when was the last time it actually pursued it's stated goals? A political party that doesn't pursue its goals is worthless.
The two-party system, the constitutional repubic and the election process is gone. Thank you very much.
You have an african kingdom and your freedom is gone.
You will have war at home within a year.
That argument doesn’t have a great deal of merit when you look at the Indiana Senate race numbers - Richard Mourdock was not moderate. The Libertarian candidate got a rather huge chunk of the vote there for a third party candidate, and enough to have given the seat to Mourdock with the current numbers coming in.