Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dila813
It is a Romney failure and a failure for the Republicans to realize that they can’t win against a liberal candidate with a moderate.

Indeed; in real terms 'moderate' means "doesn't stand for anything."
Any candidate who actually stood for something good, say Ron Paul, would have had it... but, no, we have to blame voters for not voting the way we want. (After all, no opinion is valid unless it matches ours.) [/sarc]

The republican party needs disbanded.

Indeed; it does a good job talking about things... but when was the last time it actually pursued it's stated goals? A political party that doesn't pursue its goals is worthless.

9 posted on 11/06/2012 9:32:51 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark

Brit Hume said that the election results proved once and for all that 80% of moderates that Romney was going after are liberals.

Conclusive proof that Repubs were fools to run a moderate candidate themselves.


37 posted on 11/06/2012 9:56:17 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: OneWingedShark

Pardon me, you think Ron Paul would have won this election?


55 posted on 11/06/2012 10:38:13 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson