Posted on 11/06/2012 9:23:56 AM PST by ebysan
Frank Gaffney on Benghazigate scandal
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/categories/C4
Gaffney talks about Benghazi's purpose was to try to secure weapons left over from Gadhafi's stock pile. The US was moving these weapons to arm our enemies.... jihadists & al Qaeda!!
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/22/the-real-reason-behind-benghazigate/
GAFFNEY: The real reason behind Benghazigate Was Obama gun-walking arms to jihadists?
Thanks to intrepid investigative reporting notably by Bret Baier and Catherine Herridge at Fox News, Aaron Klein at WND.com and Clare Lopez at RadicalIslam.org and information developed by congressional investigators, the mystery is beginning to unravel with regard to what happened that night and the reason for the subsequent, clumsy official cover-up now known as Benghazigate
The evidence suggests that the Obama administration has not simply been engaging, legitimating, enriching and emboldening Islamists who have taken over or are ascendant in much of the Middle East. Starting in March 2011, when American diplomat J. Christopher Stevens was designated the liaison to the opposition in Libya, the Obama administration has been arming them, including jihadists like Abdelhakim Belhadj, leader of the al Qaeda franchise known as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.
Fox News has chronicled how the Al Entisar, a Libyan-flagged vessel carrying 400 tons of cargo, docked on Sept. 6 in the Turkish port of Iskenderun. It reportedly supplied both humanitarian assistance and arms including deadly SA-7 man-portable surface-to-air missiles apparently destined for Islamists, again including al Qaeda elements, in Syria.
What cries out for further investigation and debate in the remaining days of this presidential election is whether this shipment was part of a larger covert Obama effort to transfer weapons to our enemies that could make the Iran-Contra scandal, to say nothing of Operation Fast and Furious, pale by comparison.
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
“It is by no means certain that Amb. Stevens was alive for that bit of theater of rescuers transporting him to the hospital.”
ISLAMISTS DRAG ? DEAD BODY OF US AMBASSADOR THROUGH THE STREETS (For 8-12 hours!! Reports from Middle East he was also Sodomized many times in this 8-12 hour drag through the streets
Hillary said they were carrying his body to hospital......... give me a break!!
The photos don’t depict islamist gently carrying Ambassador Chris Stevens
to the Hospital!!!
Jail? Traitors are hanged.
That too. It generally takes me less than 8 hours to get a critically injured person to the ER.
Would not be leaked from the left. Would be leaked by the same group of people that leaked 911 was an inside job. From the people that actually run DC. RINO/DINO. And they do not have to leak it. Just start the rumors and others will pick it up for blog hits and away she goes.
The purpose of them starting the 911 was an inside job theory, was to obfuscate that 911 was facilitated by people inside the US government. Why were none of those people prosecuted ?
If Obama loses will there be more focus or less on Bhengzi-gate or less?
Let us assume that this is correct, why would al Queda do something which would destroy this pipeline? This is what collapses this theory for me.
Now it does appear to me to be true that someone wanted Stevens dead for some reason.
1- requests for more security were declined;
2- security on the spot was actually REDUCED;
3- armed drones patrolling Libyan chemical weapons depots were withdrawn from their normal 24-7 actions;
4- there had been two prior terror attacks on the compound;
5- after an unsuccessful assassination attempt the British Ambassador was withdrawn from Benghazi;
6- security evaluation was screaming for more;
7- Stevens was sent into this cesspool without a chance.
When the ex-SEALS decided to act against the chain of command things got derailed.
Either the idea was to set up a kidnap-release scenario or creating a Gay Hero Martyr either for the benefit of The Disaster’s Campaign. This was about the only way they could win.
Are you explicitly accusing me of being a member of "the same group of people that leaked 911 was an inside job." of being one of "the people that actually run DC." of being a "RINO/DINO"?
A clarification or an apology would be greatly appreciated at this point.
If they wanted to kidnap Stevens, a simple road block would have worked. They would not have attacked a Mission with a known safe room. The primary purpose of the attack appears to be taking down the Obama/Hillary regimes covert gun running into Libya through Turkey. Stevens had just had a meeting with Turkish officials a couple of hours earlier that day.
Thank you for the clarification.
And just so you know, personally believe that Osama Bin Laden was already dead when they raided his home (kidney/liver failure). They killed a stooge, otherwise his wife would have died trying to protect him. So I believe some deal was made with Al Qeada. Let Obama appear as if he killed Osama, and they would get something in return. Like for example, all the weapons they need in Syria.
So I am willing to believe the Stevens was an insider job gone wrong theory, but we need the motives and facts to match the theory.
I think the attackers wanted inside the compound. Lots of documents and computers with asset lists, equipment locations, names/locations of operatives, upcoming plans, etc. The Amb may have been the primary target, but the second would most likely have been the data/info in the compound.
PING!
Did I see that there had been a whole lot of millions of dollars US in CASH - that was there but then disappeared?
Surely motive for someone who knew.
yep.
Makes sense.
And I don't think they gave a damn about the blind sheik.
I'm missing something? Aren't the Iranians on the side of Assad's government and the 'freedom fighters' destroying the country the same allah-akbar shouting scumbags that destoyed Libya with the help of NATO?
I have thought that myself. However, I think looking for a deep explanation for the attack is over thinking it. Al Qaeda chased out the Brits, Red Cross and all other westerners. I see no reason to think they wanted anything more than to humiliate the U.S. and chase us out. They did get a load of intel but IMO that was a happenstance bonus.
Here we go:
Zawahiri: Benghazi Showed US Weakness
*********************************EXCERPT********************************************
"Their awe is lost and their might is gone and they don't dare to carry out a new campaign like their past ones in Iraq and Afghanistan," said Zawahiri.
U.S. officials have said they were shifting their focus to the Asia-Pacific. A September report from U.S. policy center Rand Corp. warns that a "fourth wave" of al-Qaida is spreading to new areas of the Middle East and North Africa as the U.S. strategic focus moves east
*********************************************
Reminder how Obama was making a big campaign out of killing Osama bin Laden......then the Benghazi attack happened.
A ready made opportunity for Zawahiri to demonstrate that Al-Queda was alive...... How about that for motive......
To be clear... I think you are right...I just wanted to support what you said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.