I am convinced that the President's HHS mandate is not accidental, but deliberate. He knows that (1) Catholic bishops will not betray their principles and provide hospital, school, and charity employees health insurance that includes the funding abortion and birth control; and (2) the Church will pay the huge fines until they have no choice to close the doors to all of these institutions.
Why?
With Obamacare, there will be fewer doctors, rationing of scarcer health care, and ever-increasing costs of an increasingly older citizenry. Who will cost/expend the most of these dwindling resources? The answer:
(1)Unborn children whose prenatal care reveals abnormalities and health problems that will cost the system every year of their life. (It happens: last year, doctors encouraged my sister-in-law and brother to abort their son because they thought he had Downs Syndrome and other ailments; they refused, but he was born with many birth defects).
(2) The elderly whose productive days are long in the past, but whose visits to the doctor's office are weekly, not annually.
(3) The chronically ill.
To curtail the costs incurred by the first category, HHS will want doctors to encourage abortions--that will never happen in a Catholic hospital.
To curtail the costs of the elderly and the chronic ill, HHS will deny them the level of care they now enjoy and encourage euthanasia--again something the Church will never sanction at its hospitals.
Thus, the best way to keep costs down is to get the Catholic Church (and like-minded Christians) out of health care entirely.
As for schools, close down the parochial schools and you have no debates about voucher programs and school choice, less competition for teacher union power, and an education system that can dispense with outdated Judeo-Christian values.
Finally, close down the non-profits, you increase dependence on government programs--and make the so-called 47% a super-majority big government electorate.
What is so scary about this is that Obama is attacking the Church on a doctrinal point that few Catholics actually follow or agree with: the use of artificial birth control. The public has swallowed the media's attempt to frame the issue as about birth control and the Church trying to deny them reproductive freedom. Even my most intelligent friends fail to see that the actual issue is about the First Amendment and the unconstitutional attempt to force an employer to violate his institution's or his own personal religious beliefs in subjugation of a secular government's decree. (They finally see the point when I ask them if I have a Second Amendment right to own a gun or a First Amendment right to free speech (they agree), and then when I inquire whether I have a right to receive their tax dollars to buy a Glock handgun or air time on a radio station to express my political views.)
We need to see why Obama is doubling down against the Catholic Church and other Christians before it's too late.
I’m a Catholic and it has long frustrated me that so many of my fellow Catholics seem to migrate to the Democrats. Never ever understood that.
The movie Hope and Change for free on Hulu: http://www.hulu.com/#!watch/409925
Get the word out and send the link to all your lefty friends.
Here in NJ the government has been very successful in closing down Catholic hospitals and schools; for the former they required the emergency rooms to treat everyone regardless of their ability while constantly reducing the reimbursement from the state for those unable to, and with the latter they simply taxed everyone so much for the public education that they couldn’t afford private schools.
It was a brilliant plan, was carried out successfully, and without a whimper from the hierarchy.
What is so scary is that so few seeem to recognize that "birth control" now includes such lovelies as RU-486, "the morning after pill" which goes beyond preventing conception, beyond preventing implantation, and makes the subtle but significant jump to abortifacient.
Though the developing and implanted fetus may be in its earliest stages, this amounts to a chemical abortion.
So, it isn't just about 'birth control' as most conceive it, but about marketing very early first trimester drug-induced abortion as 'birth control'.
Those easily duped by the rhetoric might take a different stance if the media would only honestly discuss the issue.