Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

It gets worse. Pentagon says they reacted with plans for “hostage situation”. No attempt to save lives or intervene in attack.


2 posted on 11/02/2012 7:20:07 PM PDT by kristinn (Dump the Chump in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kristinn

That tells me they EXPECTED hostages. The two SEALs obviously didn’t get the memo.


10 posted on 11/02/2012 7:35:29 PM PDT by MestaMachine (obama kills and none dare call it treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Perhaps they reacted with plans for “hostage situation “ because hostage situation WAS the plan.


13 posted on 11/02/2012 7:39:08 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Pentagon says they reacted with plans for “hostage situation”

That actually fits with the theory I've seen kicked around that our government knew the attack was going to happen and that the goal was to take hostages allowing Obama to trade the Blind Sheikh for our Ambassador and any other hostages.

Back door deal with the Muslim Brotherhood and their moles in our government.

Tin foil hat kind of stuff but back on 9/17 it was being reported that the administration was in negotiations for release of the Blind Sheikh, 6 days after the failed kidnapping of Chris Stevens.

Pretty thin, but with this administration nothing surprises me anymore.

27 posted on 11/02/2012 9:10:18 PM PDT by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson