[Lurker]

Sandusky’s “self interest” involved directly harming another human being, something which Rand specifically rejected. But you knew that.

I do not suffer fools gladly. Indeed at my age I try not to suffer them at all. Therefore this conversation is over.

[Joe 6-pack]

"Sandusky’s “self interest” involved directly harming another human being, something which Rand specifically rejected. But you knew that."

And I acknowledged as much in my post to you. But you knew that. But it begs the question, who gets to define "human being"? As it stands in this country, five supreme court justices have redefined the term to allow the wholesale slaughter of millions by denying their personhood, so I guess their rights aren't being violated, eh?

And why don't you address my hypothetical about the lowered age of consent?