Skip to comments.
The Benghazi Coverup: Are Reporters Embarrassed?
Powerline ^
| October 30, 2012
| John Hinderaker
Posted on 10/30/2012 11:53:36 AM PDT by NCjim
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Comment #1 Removed by Moderator
To: NCjim
2
posted on
10/30/2012 11:57:09 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
((God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.))
To: NCjim
Journalists are not embarrassed. They are liberals. Liberals have no principles and feel no shame.
3
posted on
10/30/2012 11:58:35 AM PDT
by
I want the USA back
(Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
To: NCjim
Problem: They have no shame.
They have convinced themselves that the demand for coverage is just rightwing propaganda. The watchdogs are off duty.
To: NCjim
5
posted on
10/30/2012 12:01:07 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
To: NCjim
Let’s face it, they will never criticize The First Black President.
Can you imagine any of these reporters ganging up on a black guy for any reason?
It’s that simple.
6
posted on
10/30/2012 12:10:50 PM PDT
by
gotribe
(He's a mack-daddy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AV415yit7Zg)
To: NCjim
I will reiterate what has been said in this forum countless times before when it comes to any incident that would reflect poorly on the ‘chosen one’. The liberal MSM won't go there ... ever.
No matter how egregious.
7
posted on
10/30/2012 12:12:22 PM PDT
by
BluH2o
To: I want the USA back
RATS (or commies or Marxists) have ONE overriding principle: PURSUIT OF SOCIAL JUSTICE.
That means redistribution, destruction of the free enterprise system, eradication of individulaism, and destruction of traditonal modes of value and morality. They only feel shame at leftist gatherings if they have not skewered America that day.
8
posted on
10/30/2012 12:14:19 PM PDT
by
SC_Pete
To: gotribe
Can you imagine any of these reporters ganging up on a black guy for any reason?
Herman Cain, for pResident... we saw what happened there...
9
posted on
10/30/2012 12:20:01 PM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(Anger a Conservative by telling a lie; Anger a Liberal by telling the truth. - RWR 8-)
To: gotribe
“Can you imagine any of these reporters ganging up on a black guy for any reason?”
Sure!
If he or she is conservative, they become Oreo’s, White inside, and that’s all that counts.
Fair Game for liberal Journolistas!
10
posted on
10/30/2012 12:20:19 PM PDT
by
BwanaNdege
(Man has often lost his way, but modern man has lost his address - Gilbert K. Chesterton)
To: NCjim
Nope. They’re petrified. The Benghazi story is going to lead to the Middle East story which will lead to the Obama story and how him and his buddies have this big plan to profit off of rebuilding the Middle East. Then, people are going to get angry and demand a Crimes Against Humanity tribunal. The question for the press at the tribunal will be, “How long after you realized these crimes were happening until you actually started running front page stories on it?” That difference in time will decide whether the journalists AIDING AND ABETTING CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY get the noose or just jail time.
11
posted on
10/30/2012 12:21:17 PM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: stephenjohnbanker
Leftists have two enduring characteristics—they are utter hypocrites and thoroughly shameless. Were this not the case, they couldn’t BE leftists.
To: All
oppsss... pResident = president. :-/
13
posted on
10/30/2012 12:23:16 PM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(Anger a Conservative by telling a lie; Anger a Liberal by telling the truth. - RWR 8-)
To: NCjim
Needs to be an investigation of the owners and management of these news outlets. I think it would be found that there is massive bribery, payoffs, and blackmail. It is either that or, these useless people really believe that they are answering a higher calling by protecting Obama.
14
posted on
10/30/2012 12:28:11 PM PDT
by
Toespi
To: NCjim
If the President is not willing to defend U.S. consulates, what is he willing to defend? Would a terrorist attack on U.S. soil be met with force?
15
posted on
10/30/2012 12:35:32 PM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(The first priority is get Obama out of the White House.)
To: skinkinthegrass
Amateurs get knocked out of serious matters very quickly. And there is no one more amateurs than Cain. He never got elected to anything and he is running for the presidency? Come on.
16
posted on
10/30/2012 12:38:07 PM PDT
by
arrogantsob
(The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
To: NCjim
Embarrassment and shame are concepts that died in the 1960s.
17
posted on
10/30/2012 12:38:28 PM PDT
by
Brooklyn Attitude
(We won't stand for biased umps fixing a ball game but we allow a biased media to fix elections.)
To: popdonnelly
Would a terrorist attack on U.S. soil be met with force? A U.S. consulate is U.S. soil.
So, you have your answer.
18
posted on
10/30/2012 12:53:37 PM PDT
by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
To: gotribe
Can you imagine any of these reporters ganging up on a black guy for any reason? Alan Keyes, Herman Cain, Alan West, Clarence Thomas...
19
posted on
10/30/2012 12:56:06 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Day 1379 of the Obama Regime - Barack Hussein Obama an enemy BOTH foreign AND domestic)
To: popdonnelly
>"Would a terrorist attack on U.S. soil be met with force?"They can barely "force" Hassan to shave for his trial.
20
posted on
10/30/2012 1:01:32 PM PDT
by
rawcatslyentist
("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson