Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

It’s treated that way because its a hopeless basket case. My god you elected Jerry Brown, AGAIN! In 2010 every state wide office went to the Rats. The rest of us don’t our money being pissed down a rat hole, and it costs a fortune to compete there.


10 posted on 10/28/2012 3:39:32 PM PDT by Kozak (The means of defence again.t foreign danger, have been always the instruments of tyranny at home JM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Kozak

On the other hand, the state recalled its liberal governor a few years ago, and elected a Republican. True, his name was Schwarzenegger, but still you can’t say a major effort wasn’t made. Also, this state put in the “three strikes law” which lowered major crimes by a lot by putting repeat offenders away for the long term. Finally, this state passed a defense of marriage initiative. It got challenged in court, but it won a popular vote.

I’m not writing it off. yet.


17 posted on 10/28/2012 4:12:03 PM PDT by married21 (As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Kozak
It’s treated that way because its a hopeless basket case.

Proposition 8
Eliminates the Right of Same-Sex Couples to Marry

For / Against
7,001,084 / 6,401,482
52.3% / 47.7%


Hmm, then how did the basket-case electorate figure this one out?  And why couldn't they figure other things out, if approached with a loud reasoned Conservative voice?

My god you elected Jerry Brown, AGAIN!


I did?  Oh really?

Here are the results of the 2010 Election specific to Jerry Brown.

Jerry Brown 5,428,149 53.8%
Meg Whitman 4,127,391 40.9%


Brown won the election by 12.9%.  So thrilled was the electorate with the choice between Whitman and Brown, that 5.3% of the voters went third party.  If we could have appealed to those voters, the spread would have been 7.6%.  That would mean that a swing of only 3.8% + 1 would have won this for the Libtard the California leadership foisted off on us.

I refused to vote of either of these idiots.

Don't blame Californians for getting it wrong, when we have the whole Democrat party and the California Republican Party leadership tag-teaming against us.  If you think I was going to vote for another idiot-stick Feaux-Conservative, you're crazy.

What was on the agenda in 2010?

1. We were coming off seven years of the Libtard Schwarzenegger(R)
2. We were lofting the Leftist likes of Meg (I so want you to believe I am a Conservative, even though I'm not) Whitman(R)
3. She was another McCain accolyte, a fraud from the word go as a Conservative

4. The state's Republican leadership thinks folks won't figure that out.  They're nuts.

In 2010 every state wide office went to the Rats.

Sure did.  You P off enough Conservatives, and a good number of them will stay home.  I voted for every slot except the top one, but others are so P'd off, they don't.  Frankly, I don't blame them either.  What's the use?  The better candidates are abandoned by the leadership.  It's an act of futility to even go to the polls.  Thankfully we vote for governor in off years.  If this vote would have taken place in 2008, Brown would have won by 20 + percent.

The rest of us don’t want our money being pissed down a rat hole, and it costs a fortune to compete there.


Presidential candidates of either party rarely campaign in California toward the end of the election season, given the state’s Democratic tilt. But it is a popular stop on the fundraising circuit, with its residents donating the most of any state to the 2012 presidential campaign. Romney has raised $19.3 million [in state]... LINK

You don't want your money wasted in our state?  LOL  Well, frankly I'd like our tens of millions spent in our state for a change.  Imagine that!

If our gubenatoral candidates are sound, the state leadership abandons them.  If they're Liberals, the state leadership pulls out all the stops to support them. Then the national leadership supports Leftists, and those Leftists couldn't make an effective appeal in the state even if they did show up here.

There is strong evidence that Californians are receptive to appeals on core issues.  Those appeals are never made.  And then I see folks come to the conclusion that Hispanics will not vote for our people.  Ridiculous.

Read up on what issues are important to Hispanics.  It might surprise you when you find out that illegal immigration fixes are not at the top of their list.  Despite this, we don't appeal to them on the matters they do care about, and do appeal for their votes on this issue.  LINK

The RNC is lost in space, and as it relates to California a lot of other people are too.

And of course, it's always good to know that folks caling themselves Conservative are in favor of surrendering states to the Left.  Our troops on foreign lands risking their lives for every inch of our soil, must be thrilled to know it.


Regulator:

You should discuss illegal immigration with Hispanics.  You'd be suprised to know that many of them are angry about it too.  Guess who the first people to lose jobs are, when they've worked their way up to a better position, only to be let go and replaced by illegal immigrants.  People in Mexico laugh at us.  They think we're the biggest idiots on the planet for allowing what we do.  A lot of Hispanics here do too.
33 posted on 10/29/2012 9:25:56 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (You know, if Obama wins he's going to inherit a terrible situation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson