Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

I guess my problem is that, when I was a kid in school in the ‘60s, my school was very much integrated. Some folks here seem to believe that blacks and whites lived in a vacuum...totally separated from each other.

We didn’t.

I’m not shucking or jiving in any way, shape or form.

I’m telling you that things weren’t as portrayed in the media. And, I’m telling you that you don’t know what you’re talking about.

But, you couldn’t, unless you lived it...so I understand.

It has nothing to do with being a Democrat, or not.

It has to do with a federal government, which happened to be dem at the time, that would force one to do something that they didn’t want to do.

I’m speaking of my black friends who didn’t want what the feds forced on them.

Most don’t even know that is what was happening at the time.


83 posted on 11/01/2012 12:45:12 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 (I can see November from my house! dc2k circa 2010 Once again...with feeling!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: dixiechick2000

This is going to be long. I apologize. I didn’t want there to be any ambiguity in my comments.

Okay, thank you. I’m sure from your perspective, you did see a different angle than what was conveyed in the media. Does that mean that your angle was the only angle, and that none of what was portrayed in the media was true?

I’m not sure of your precise age at the time. As a young person you may or may not have been able to discern if your school was on a par with other schools. I’m not entirely sure what evaluations were made at the time. Were you aware of them in real time? I’m not trying to be insulting, but I’m not sure kids really do understand the nuances of situations like what existed in those days.

It would seem to me that you and your friends were probably happy in your classes. I’m sure it did seem like an unnecessary inconvenience for kids to be moved to another school. I’m sure it did seem like a lot of commotion over nothing. On the other hand, if ten schools were integrated and there were three that weren’t, does that make it okay for the three to be segregated?

I don’t doubt that some kids were somewhat bewildered by what was going on. None the less, there was a problem. Schools were ordered to allow all local students access. Two separate governors refused to allow it.

That being the case, there was going to be push-back.

At the time, these schools weren’t the only facilities with problems. Civil rights were being denied throughout the region. It needed to be addressed.

As far as presidential politics had gone, the South was a solid lock for the Democrats in these days.

It was and still is my premise that Senator Byrd was an organizer and chapter leader of the Klu Klux Klan. From his earliest political days, he was a Democrat.

Is that something that wasn’t about race or politics?

I don’t want to bother looking up Faubus’ actions in Little Rock too, but I do know what the case was with Wallace and his attempts to block Black kids access to White schools.

Wallace was a firm believer in segregation. Whatever your experiences were in school, or what you thought all Black kids wanted or didn’t want to do, Black kids did want to attend the school Wallace sought to block them from entering. I suspect kids wanted to enter the segregated school in Little Rock too. If there weren’t other problems in the region, perhaps this wouldn’t have been addressed with the fervor it was.

Yes, it certainly was John F. Kennedy and his Attorney General Robert Kennedy, who forced Wallace to allow those kids to enter that school. And while the Kennedy’s were obviously Democrats, the two men that stood up to stop Black kids in the South from entering two schools, were obviously not Republicans. In 1957, it was Dwight Eisenhower(R) who used the National Guard to force Faubus to allow Black students in.

And lest we miss the point of Wallace’s intent, here is what he said twenty years after the event.

“Change of positions”

“In the late 1970s, Wallace announced that he was a born-again Christian and apologized to black civil rights leaders for his past actions as a segregationist. He said that while he had once sought power and glory, he realized he needed to seek love and forgiveness. In 1979, Wallace said of his stand in the schoolhouse door: “I was wrong. Those days are over, and they ought to be over.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Wallace#cite_note-over-3

Wiki isn’t the best reference, but this is a fairly well known quote. It has been out there for decades. In Wallace’s later years, he mellowed considerably. In fact, I believe he was favorable to seeing Blacks treated fairly.

Okay, Wallace says his actions were as a result of being a Segregationist. Doesn’t that reveal to you that in the instance involving Wallace at least, there was a problem?

If the children in classes with you didn’t want to change schools because they already had established friendships, does that mean there wasn’t a problem? I don’t believe it does.

The media probably did make it look like most schools in the region were refusing to integrate. I can certainly see why that would tweak you. I don’t blame you. My comments being overly broad, probably did upset you too. For that I am sorry. I may even be saying things in this post that seem insensitive to you. I’m not trying to tweak you.

During the day, there were segregated businesses, restrooms, schools..., and blacks were being demanded to ride in the back of the bus. Access for Blacks was clearly inferior.

In the late 1960s, I returned to Southern California. At the time, Blacks were essentially treated like anyone else. I’m not going to say there weren’t any problems, but the problems in the South weren’t present there in anything like the same level.

The North East, the North, and the West were different than the South in that respect. That’s not just my take on things.

Does that mean that every person in the South treated Blacks terribly? I don’t think so at all. I do think a lot of people looked the other way though.

If you still believe these are unfair characterizations, I would like to hear your thoughts on it.

I am particularly interested in how old you were at the time, and whether you feel that you were old enough to understand all the nuances of what was taking place.

Sorry to make this long of a post on the subject.

Take care.


84 posted on 11/01/2012 2:05:56 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Pres__ent Resident NBC NRD N3pmCs HCR / no birth C / no req docs / no 3pm calls / he can read)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson