If these 20 folks, and surviving CIA folks that were survivors, can get their faces in front of cameras, and tell the story, then this thing is going to wind up going from a very big story, to THE story of the Obama administration. It appears to be heading that way.
I only heard a little bit of Rush but what I heard, it didn’t seem like he gets what’s really going on here.
Why would anybody tell these people to stand down, if the Administration didn’t already know that the attack was supposed to end up harmless? If they didn’t know any better, they had to assume that shots were fired and people were going to be killed. In that case, they told these CIA people to stand down, they ignored the lasers and coordinates telling them where to fire, and they set attackers free... as a concession that those 20 people (who ended up being rescued by the former SEALs) and Stevens and the guy with him were all going to die.
Why would they do that? What possible reason could they give? They had a drone there and could have broken up the attack within about an hour if they had allowed the standard protocols to be followed. At risk were the lives of 22 people.
Their actions only make sense if they were either sadistic enough to want those people dead or not care if they were dead.... or if they knew the kidnapping was not supposed to be fatal for those 22 people.
What other explanation can they give?
Now they say 2 drones.
Why would they be painting a mortar team with a laser?
AT least one of those drones had hellfire missiles, I would bet anything.