Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking Rasmussen : Pennsylvania Senate: Casey (D) 46%, Smith (R) 45%
Rasmussen Reports ^

Posted on 10/26/2012 6:54:11 AM PDT by sunmars

The U.S. Senate race in Pennsylvania is now essentially a tie.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in the Keystone State finds incumbent Democratic Senator Bob Casey, Jr. with 46% of the vote, while Republican Tom Smith attracts 45%. Nine percent (9%) are still undecided.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 2012polls; bobcasey; tomsmith
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
Well things are looking up.....This is good news, Obama is gonna have to spend money defending PA.
1 posted on 10/26/2012 6:54:17 AM PDT by sunmars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sunmars

Nice!


2 posted on 10/26/2012 6:57:48 AM PDT by jimfree (In Nov 2012 my 12 y/o granddaughter has more relevant&quality executive experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

This is awesome news! Go Tom Smith!


3 posted on 10/26/2012 6:59:39 AM PDT by woweeitsme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

This means PA is turning purple! I think its winnable and if Romney can carry it, Tom Smith has a decent shot of getting into the Senate.


4 posted on 10/26/2012 6:59:50 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved FrieGrnd Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

Obama must be wondering where to put the money because its not gonna stretch everywhere if he has to run ads in PA, Mi, Minn, Wisc, Iowa, Nevada, Ohio.

Who does he throw to the wolves.


5 posted on 10/26/2012 7:00:52 AM PDT by sunmars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

It already was turning in 2010 when Toomey got elected. This my well be the icing.


6 posted on 10/26/2012 7:02:52 AM PDT by sunmars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

Great news!!!


7 posted on 10/26/2012 7:05:25 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Record high turnout is our hope for sending 0bama home. Pray hard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

Smith SHOULD win this one.

I haven’t even heard a single ad for Casey anywhere. The guy was a dud 6 years ago, and only got in because Santorum was so damned bad.


8 posted on 10/26/2012 7:05:45 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

I don’t think Ol’ Bushy Brows is spending much Dem money at all. Tom’s problem is he has no NAME. I emailed my friends telling them to vote Smith. ALL said who is he, what’s he running for? I said Casey is his opponent. Half actually said “Is he still in office?” Gives you an idea about HIM.


9 posted on 10/26/2012 7:10:11 AM PDT by Safetgiver ( Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunmars
The biggest numbers here are the incumbent at 46% -- Historically a death number this close to an election -- and Undecided at 9% since they usually break 2-1 for the challenger this late.

Altogether it adds up to 51-49 at a minimum for Smith, and that isn't even taking any possible sample skew into account.

Bottom line -- these numbers are devestating for Casey and indicate a likely pickup for the Repoublicans.

Of course, there is the HUGE caveat that is the Philly voter fraud we know will happen. But my personal opinion is I don't think the D's can pass off a 150% turnout this time around.

10 posted on 10/26/2012 7:11:48 AM PDT by commish (After Four Years of Obama, America needs a little R & R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
The guy was a dud 6 years ago, and only got in because Santorum was so damned bad.

Santorum wasn't bad. He got caught up in the huge Dem tidal wave in the 2006 midterms that gave the Dems control over Congress and added a large number of state governorships. It was a wipe out that presaged the even bigger Dem victory in 2008.

11 posted on 10/26/2012 7:14:07 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: commish

Corbett and the state GOP were wise to bring up Voter ID, now any cases of outrageous fraud will be used against the Dems for opposing the law.


12 posted on 10/26/2012 7:15:05 AM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: commish

Romney MUST move into PA and MI - expand the field and drain Obama dry. Need contingencies to both Ohio and Wisconsin.

Moving into Minnesota was a good move, and beneficial to both Iowa and Wisconsin in certain TV markets.


13 posted on 10/26/2012 7:15:57 AM PDT by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

The funny thing is that Casey’s been running all these supposed attack ads against Smith - in the primary I voted for the other pro-life TEA party guy whose name I now can’t recall. Every time I see one of Casey’s ads I think, “Oh, that Smith sounds like a pretty good guy afterall. Can’t wait to vote for him.”


14 posted on 10/26/2012 7:18:22 AM PDT by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

Toomey was almost guaranteed the spot with Arlen’s turncoating.

However, yes PA is not the blue state everyone outside thinks it is. This cycle the Democratic Governor is gone, so no help using state employees and coercion. Obama’s 4 year long attack on blue dogs etc... PA can very likely go RED this time.

Casey has nothing, his daddy’s name and that’s it. Momentum is definitely with Smith... we’ll see how it closes.


15 posted on 10/26/2012 7:18:54 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mwl8787
Romney MUST move into PA and MI - expand the field and drain Obama dry. Need contingencies to both Ohio and Wisconsin.

I saw this morning that GOP insiders in Wisconsin think Romney is only down about 2 points there, with strong momentum, and that he could very well wind up winning it. And, I think he has already won Ohio, because Obama's early vote effort is way down from 2008 results.

I'd rank the likelihood of carrying these four states like this: Ohio, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan. In some precincts of Detroit, 110% of registered voters will turn out. :)

16 posted on 10/26/2012 7:21:29 AM PDT by TonyInOhio (Defend Freedom / Defeat Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kabar

No my friend, Santorum was that damned bad.

You don’t lose by 17 points because you got “caught up in a democratic wave”.

I am so sick of people who don’t live in PA telling me how good or bad someone who represenated my state was.

Santorum was indeed that bad. He’s far more liked outside of PA than inside of PA with good reason.

Trying to spin a 17 point loss to an opponent who literally no showed the campaign is beyond ignorant.

Casey didn’t win by 17, Santorum LOST by 17. Had santorum lost by 10 or less you could try to make the argument you are.. he lost by nearly 20! That’s not getting swept up in a democratic wave, that’s being sent packing because the electorate rejected you.

There is a 1/2 BILLION less than one mile tunnel that Santorum used to buy an endorcement from the unions, etc etc etc.. don’t tell me Santorum wasn’t bad.. Santorum was horrific, he earned and deserved the defeat he was handed.


17 posted on 10/26/2012 7:24:14 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sunmars
Does anybody have an explanation for the disparity between the numbers for Smith and the numbers for Romney? Rasmussen has Romney down about five.

Why would Obama be so much more popular than Casey or why would Romney be so much less popular than Smith?


18 posted on 10/26/2012 7:31:27 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio

I think Romney likely has IA, WI, OH and IN locked up.

I think PA & MI are winnable but tougher.

MN and IL are off the table.


19 posted on 10/26/2012 7:32:25 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Oh Indiana is locked up, rasmussen had Romney up 13% last week there.


20 posted on 10/26/2012 7:36:31 AM PDT by sunmars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson