Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel

This is so dumb it seems like she got the fair share back at the time of the divorce and than it sky rocketed up later on why should she get more that was not the value at the time of the divorce.

Like we all have found out that have stock it goes up and down, and up and down.

I guess Mitt was to have a crystal ball and say in a year it will go 10 x times how would he know this.. no story. If she was smart she would have held onto it and watch for the value to increase and than sold the stock but what do I know I am a dumb middle class, bitter clinger


59 posted on 10/25/2012 8:58:42 PM PDT by proudCArepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: proudCArepublican

So in his 1991 testimony, Romney confirms that in 1988 nobody had clairvoyant knowledge of what the stock price would be in 1989.

Shocking.


62 posted on 10/25/2012 9:08:45 PM PDT by RightStuff1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: proudCArepublican

And of top of that, she still ended up with $5.5 million more in value from the shares she still had not sold.

This is ridiculous.


68 posted on 10/25/2012 9:25:37 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson