Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WH: ‘We Decline to Comment’ on When Obama Learned of E-Mails, Met With NSC on Benghazi
CNSNews ^

Posted on 10/24/2012 1:49:27 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

WH: ‘We Decline to Comment’ on When Obama Learned of E-Mails, Met With NSC on Benghazi By Fred Lucas October 24, 2012

(CNSNews.com) - The White House is declining to say when President Barack Obama first learned of three e-mails that the State Department sent to the White House on Sept. 11, 2012, directly notifying the Executive Office of the President that the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was under attack, that U.S. Amb. Chris Stevens was at the Benghazi mission at the time of the attack, and that the group Ansar al-Sharia had taken credit for the attack.

The White House also declined to say when the president first met with the National Security Council after the Benghazi attack.

“I have been asked by one of our spokespeople to relay ‘that we decline to comment,’” said White House National Security Staff aide Debbie Bird in a written response to CNSNews.com.

CNSNews.com had asked Bird: 1) “When did the President first meet with the National Security Council after the Benghazi attack on 9/11/12?” 2) “When did White House staff first discuss the substance of the e-mails that went to the White House with the President or with the National Security Advisor?”

Carney also took a question about the e-mails today during a press gaggle held aboard Air Force One at 9:34 a.m. A reporter asked: “Jay, there are some emails that have emerged, which suggest that the White House and other areas of the government were told within hours of the Benghazi attack that an extremist group had claimed responsibility. How is that compatible with the idea that it was a spontaneous attack?”

Carney downplayed the significance of the State Department emails.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazi; benghazicoverup; benghaziemails; benghazigate; denial; nocomment; shadowwars; threatmatrix; whbenghaziemails
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last
To: maggief

Impeach!! Enough!!

Reports that the guns that our heros were using at the annex had blood all over them...they fought even after they were mortally wounded.
Obama And his entire administration should be impeached...NOW!!


101 posted on 10/24/2012 4:39:16 PM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER TO A SPECIAL PROSECUTER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

Ed Klein on Beck this morning said he has sources that say Hillary has documentary proof that she approved the additional security being asked for and it never happened. He seems to feel that she has her butt covered. Beck questioned his sources - Klein said he has two and they are legal advisors to Clinton ... he would be very surprised if they are lying although he doesn’t totally rule it out. Hillary is not going down for/with Obama.


102 posted on 10/24/2012 4:46:50 PM PDT by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: maggief; hoosiermama; penelopesire; ColdOne; Protect the Bill of Rights; onyx; MestaMachine; ...

More questions than answers from Jennifer Griffin (got her info from Pentagon source)

Transcript of Jennifer Griffen’s report -— 5 minutes into “Special Report with Bret Baier”

Brett Baier: The attack on the consulate in Libya triggered a wide array of moves by the Pentagon, but help never arrived....Jennifer Griffin looks at that part of the story”:

Griffen: Shortly after the attack began an unarmed US predator drone was positioned over Benghazi.

6 hrs 20min after the attack started, former Seals Woods and Doherty were killed at the CIA annex, a mile from the consulate, by a mortar shell at 4am local time.

The President met his Def Sec and VP in the Oval Office within an hour of the attacks onset.

The Pentagon began moving military assets.

1) 8 special operators were sent from Tripoli

2) A fast team from Rota, Spain were sent to guard the embassy but remained in the capitol

3) A special operations force was moved from central Europe to Sigonella Air Base in southern Italy, just 480 miles from Benghazi

4) F16s and Apache helicopters remained parked and un-used at Aviano Air Base in northern Italy

5) Two Navy destroyers, already in the Mediterranean, were moved off the coast of Libya on the day of the attack, but were never used

Bing West: “For the US military to say that they were 480 miles away and they couldn’t do anything anf they couldn’t move one aircraft in 8 hrs, I’d say it’s time to relieve a lot of people in the chain of command, but I just don’t believe that.”

Griffin cites “US officials” who defended non-action, saying they worried about friendly fire, an ambush, etc, etc, etc.

The fighting at the consulate was over in one hour, according to the recently leaked State Dept emails...

Officials in Washington reading those cables may have thought the attack was over. Now they know it was a 2-pronged attack at 2 separate locations that lasted more than 6 hrs.

****end of Griffin report


103 posted on 10/24/2012 5:03:53 PM PDT by thouworm (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: maine yankee

Geez, are you, like 12? There are two weeks before the most important election in our history and you are wishing that the GOP stops campaigning to whip up an Impeachment? Get real.


104 posted on 10/24/2012 5:08:54 PM PDT by arrogantsob (The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dirtymac

Why yes he did. “Uriah” Stevens, eh?


105 posted on 10/24/2012 5:12:06 PM PDT by arrogantsob (The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Pride in the USA; Stillwaters

Obozo pleading the fifth. How much longer can the mainstream media keep a lid on this for him?


106 posted on 10/24/2012 5:14:25 PM PDT by lonevoice (Today I broke my personal record for most consecutive days lived)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

We are going to have to demand impeachment if Obama wins or steals this election. The grassroots might as well start prepping the ground IMHO.


107 posted on 10/24/2012 5:19:32 PM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER TO A SPECIAL PROSECUTER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: thouworm; hoosiermama; penelopesire

McCain on Anderson Cooper.

Sick of his folksy I’m a great admirer of Hillary Clinton crap.


108 posted on 10/24/2012 5:20:03 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The President acted stupidly.


109 posted on 10/24/2012 5:22:12 PM PDT by Henry Hnyellar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thouworm

What a muddled mess. Basically Obama and his minions have said everything at some point, which will make it very hard to nail them down. Purposeful? You betcha.


110 posted on 10/24/2012 5:22:19 PM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER TO A SPECIAL PROSECUTER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia

Running down the clock ...


111 posted on 10/24/2012 5:23:22 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maggief

If McCain is the point man on this scandal....we will get nowhere near any truth...lol.


112 posted on 10/24/2012 5:24:10 PM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER TO A SPECIAL PROSECUTER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

If he wins this election it would be an exercise in futility since the RATs will still control the Senate and maybe even the House.


113 posted on 10/24/2012 6:05:45 PM PDT by arrogantsob (The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

What’s to say a few emails get “lost?”


114 posted on 10/24/2012 6:10:22 PM PDT by jch10 (America needs some R and R!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

115 posted on 10/24/2012 6:28:16 PM PDT by New Perspective (Proud father of a 8 yr old son with Down Syndrome and fighting to keep him off Obama's death panels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire; MestaMachine; KC_Lion; Godzilla; Domestic Church; dragonblustar; Oorang; jersey117; ..
*
*

This is important.

They are starting to realize that in impeachment hearings...all these things they have said are going to be scrutinized by lawyers....not a fawning media!! They are already sunk by their own lies folks!

Wow ping!

Schadenfreude Ping.

Thanks to penelopesire and StephenJohnbanker. .

116 posted on 10/24/2012 6:41:52 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"decline to comment"... on the basis of... ?

It's a matter of National Security? No, the timing of a discussion does not affect that...
It's none of our business? Clearly not, and we're going to keep asking...
It's privileged information? Nope, can't be that...
It's admitting a crime? No, the crime is the cover-up, not the timing of the actual discussion.

There is no rational basis for the White House to decline to comment on this question. Let's hope the MSM keeps hammering the question.

117 posted on 10/24/2012 6:46:59 PM PDT by Teacher317 ('Tis time to fear when tyrants seem to kiss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; Sarah Barracuda
My guess is that they have some damning emails, not yet released, that show them discussing how to use this attack for maximum political gain for the reelection campaign.

Exactly.

118 posted on 10/24/2012 6:51:36 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Bump


119 posted on 10/24/2012 6:51:49 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (The pundits have forgotten the 2010 elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

It is a little late for them to have no comment. There are already reports that the WH put out sayng that Obama met with his National Security Advisors as soon as the embassy came under attack! Now they are parsing words and timelines and refusing to comment on exact times?

They have legal counsel now for future prosecutions....it’s obvious.


120 posted on 10/24/2012 7:04:08 PM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER TO A SPECIAL PROSECUTER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson