Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerClaws

Divorce papers? That might be damaging if it was...1912.


6 posted on 10/23/2012 2:32:57 PM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Shadow44

Might be interesting if the rumors of Obama’s homosexuality is listed as one of the grounds for divorce.


16 posted on 10/23/2012 2:40:38 PM PDT by bhl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Shadow44
Divorce papers? That might be damaging if it was...1912.

Divorce filings often include the filer's reason for seeking the divorce. Just as a for-instance, how do you think would it impact the race if Michelle had submitted sworn testimony in court documents that Obama had smacked her around?

25 posted on 10/23/2012 2:43:39 PM PDT by Sparticus (Tar and feathers for the next dumb@ss Republican that uses the word bipartisanship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Shadow44

Were divorce papers actually filed in court or did a lawyer draw them up and keep them in a file for later use? Did someone working for a lawyer alert them to this or did someone in a clerk’s office do it? Even if true, I doubt Obama would lose a single vote because of it. With Trump, once again, much ado about nothing.


45 posted on 10/23/2012 2:51:16 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Shadow44
"Divorce papers? That might be damaging if it was...1912."

...and a Catholic wedding.

What's the big deal about divorce papers?

67 posted on 10/23/2012 3:04:15 PM PDT by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Shadow44
Divorce papers? That might be damaging if it was...1912.

Good point. It's not just that divorce has become more acceptable. It's that the divorce proceedings had to be pretty scandalous in those days, involving real misconduct. Aren't most divorces nowadays no-fault nowadays? Just a matter of incompatibility or irreconcilable differences?

In the Jack and Jeri Ryan case, it was more the child custody records that caused the trouble. With Blair Hull, Obama's primary opponent, it was a restraining order his wife filed against him. All the files were considered "divorce papers" but technically speaking they may not have been quite that, the actual divorce files being pretty innocuous.

I'm wondering a little about this. If there's anything there, could it backfire? If it's an affair with a woman for Obama, does that knock out these gay rumors? If it's a gay affair, does that win him sympathy with some people? But realistically, I don't think either is the big secret.

74 posted on 10/23/2012 3:16:20 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Shadow44

Depends what is contained in the divorce records...perhaps evidence of Obama trolling for gay sex in exchange for providing cocaine to complete strangers?


96 posted on 10/23/2012 3:49:34 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Shadow44
"Divorce papers? That might be damaging if it was...1912."

HA....good one!

122 posted on 10/23/2012 9:04:45 PM PDT by hummingbird (Lather, Rinse........BUT DO NOT REPEAT - REPEAT IS A WASTE - A SCAM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Shadow44
Divorce papers? That might be damaging if it was...1912.

Try 2004.

127 posted on 10/23/2012 11:43:09 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Shadow44

Imagine what justification would be for grounds for divorce?

I suspect it may include words like “sexual orientation”, “consummation”, and “risk of infection”


130 posted on 10/24/2012 12:03:54 AM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson