[itssme]

I believe that those folks who raised their hands in support of oboma’s lies about his take on our foreign policy did so because he “sounded” like he knew what he was talking about. Obviously, those folks did not know their facts about oboma’s handling of his foreign policy, what he has “done” and is NOT doing. So they were impressed by his raised voice, his blazing dark eyes and the lies he told as “truth.” These folks failed to ask themselves, “who do I trust to protect me and this country from our enemies..they went for style vs substance. On the economy, on the other hand, they KNOW that Romney has the cred and can do the job of creating job opportunities, to name just one item, and bringing back this country to the Constitution, Liberty and Freedom because of the plan he has laid out on what he intends to accomplish as President, and how he intends to do it.

[patriotspride]

I believe that those folks who raised their hands in support of oboma’s lies about his take on our foreign policy did so because he “sounded” like he knew what he was talking about.

---

There were 25 in the group. First show of hands on how many voted for O in 2008 was 12.

As fast as luntz does these counts , and asks questions ,it’s easy to get the impression a majority supported O as winner of the entire debate.

To me its the same as offering a lifeline for you past decision. The O voters get to pick Romney for the economy, and then him on foreign policy.

Luntz needed to clearly state this debate was x % on foreign policy, and x on economy.

With that mix in mind who , in your mind.

1) won the debate

2) won your vote

[DoughtyOne]

I guess. It’s always hard for me to watch folks miss all the warning signs though. I just hope the economy trumps the foreign policy issues. With people’s lack of mental power these days, I’m not convinced they will.

We’re 90% of the way to ‘Idiocracy’ from the look of things.