Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kingattax

My biggest fear is that R/R get 53% of the vote and somehow lose the electoral vote. It can happen. Bush destroyed Kerry in ‘04 and could have easily lost the election if OH had slipped a few points in Lurches direction.

The worst thing about this is that Nobama would still govern as if he has a mandate just to spite the people. How dare they challenge King Barak?


6 posted on 10/22/2012 9:04:55 AM PDT by thepatriot1 (...brought to you courtesy of the Red, White and Blue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: thepatriot1

The popular vote types/sites are still out there but very quiet this cycle....


7 posted on 10/22/2012 9:06:34 AM PDT by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: thepatriot1
My biggest fear is that R/R get 53% of the vote and somehow lose the electoral vote.

I don't think it's possible with a 53-47 breakdown. A close race that's withing 1 point is a possibility but I don't see that happening.

12 posted on 10/22/2012 9:12:47 AM PDT by pgkdan (A vote for anyone but Romney is a vote for obama. GO MITT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: thepatriot1

Not to worry: I believe it very likely that Obama is going to top out at 43% of the vote.


31 posted on 10/22/2012 9:32:35 AM PDT by AFPhys ((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: thepatriot1

“My biggest fear is that R/R get 53% of the vote and somehow lose the electoral vote. It can happen. Bush destroyed Kerry in ‘04 and could have easily lost the election if OH had slipped a few points in Lurches direction.”

Actually, the final total in 2004 was 51-48 Bush, and he carried OH by 126,000 votes, which was by roughly the same margin as the national poll. I wouldn’t worry about a scenario of getting 53% and losing — that, while possible, is nearly impossible, certainly nothing to lose any sleep over.


32 posted on 10/22/2012 9:40:57 AM PDT by lquist1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: thepatriot1
"Bush destroyed Kerry in ‘04 and could have easily lost the election if OH had slipped a few points in Lurches direction."

BS.

First of all, where were the votes going to come from, WHEN OHIO MIRRORED THE NATIONAL RESULTS:

2004 National 50.7 48.3
2004 Ohio 50.8 48.7

The final margin of Bush's Ohio victory was 126,885, just under the population of Dayton (166,179) as Ohio's 7th-largest city. It was a substantial Ohio win by Bush in '04 by any measure.

To illustrate: the number of votes that Kerry lost Ohio by, was greater than the number of votes needed that would have propelled Bush to take WI, PA, MI, and NH in a Reagan-like sweep -- in fact, less than 100,000 votes.

46 posted on 10/22/2012 10:44:52 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (2008 + IN, NE1, NC, FL, VA, OH, CO, IA, NV, NH = 291EV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson