Replies

Okay great SickOfLibs. Thanks for your response.

The debate is over now, and frankly I wasn’t that impressed with Romney on first blush.

I actually walked in during the debate and caught it flat.

Then I started watching Obama, and by golly, the guy was pressing very hard. By contrast Romney seemed to be taking it all in stride. He looked poised and presidential.

Obama looked like he was looking for a place to deliver a knock-out punch, needed desperately to do it, and wasn’t getting there.

I’ll watch the whole think tomorrow, but the part I saw, Romney was the guy looking presidential, and Obama was the guy trying to prove he was presidential too, and seemingly failing.

Later.

RE :”Then I started watching Obama, and by golly, the guy was pressing very hard. By contrast Romney seemed to be taking it all in stride. He looked poised and presidential.
Obama looked like he was looking for a place to deliver a knock-out punch, needed desperately to do it, and wasn’t getting there.
I’ll watch the whole think tomorrow, but the part I saw, Romney was the guy looking presidential, and Obama was the guy trying to prove he was presidential too, and seemingly failing.”

I was posting a comment every 30 min or so during the debate to share my thoughts, but before bed my final summary was this: see #1079

I always want Romney to beat Obama up, but then I am not the mushy undecided woman in the swing state(who voted for Obama) who thinks I will learn something from the debates . However if Romney loses to Obama then he did us no favors by being so nice to Obama and talking about bipartisionship.

In typical Romney pattern he shot his wad on Libya attack in the last debate then dropped the entire subject this debate.
He had agreed with Obama on helping the rebels overthrow Qaddafi. Didnt Qaddafi give up his WMDs?
I guess Romney missed that FNC special this weekend or he was scared that O had info that could blow up anything he said about it.