Posted on 10/22/2012 7:23:47 AM PDT by AmericanSamurai
What a silly corrupt sport bicycle racing has been revealed to be.
May all the cyclists who testified against him rot in hell. The guy worked every day of his life to win these races.
So who is the winner of those races then? The other guys also have been busted for doping.
Yep. Armstrong passed all the tests he took at the time. That should be good enough.
Saw one of his biggest fans today post that they were simply not accepting this decision and still consider Lance to have won the seven races.
So did some of his teammates who admitted doping.
Will all the money that Lance help raise for cancer research have to be returned to the donors now? /s
I could never stand Lance Armstrong. He is a huge liberal. I always thought he was overrated.
He passed the tests. And that makes them liars.
Armstrong supporters could give Obamabots a run for their money in the Kool-Aide drinking department.
So who is the winner of those races then?
http://news.yahoo.com/1-cycling-armstrongs-tour-titles-stripped-says-uci-111059090—spt.html
snip
Other issues such as the potential re-awarding of Armstrong’s Tour titles and the matter of prize money will be discussed by the UCI Management Committee on Friday.
Tour director Christian Prudhomme has said he believes no rider should inherit the titles given doping was so widespread among the peloton at the time but McQuaid made it clear the decision rested with his organisation, not the Tour.
....
The UCI also said it had dope tested Armstrong 218 times and the fact he never tested positive and “beat the system” means that other organisations such as the World Anti-Doping Agency should share the responsibility of accepting the results.
end snips
Ha, LA is an innovator pushing the technological envelope.
Bike arcing needs to have enforceable rules as their events occur, not 10 years later. It's a joke as a "professional" sport.
Ha, LA is an innovator pushing the technological envelope.
Bike racing needs to have enforceable rules as their events occur, not 10 years later. It's long been a joke as a "professional" sport.
“So who is the winner of those races then? The other guys also have been busted for doping.”
Nobody is a winner. I don’t think anyone will be attracted to the sport for some time.
Let’s for the sake of argument say that Armstrong was a walking pharmasy the whole time he was winning bike races.
The people who run the sport knew as much about him then as they know now. Why didn’t they ban him then?
Because he was popular and he brought attention and money to their business. It was in their interest to let it slide. Now they judege it’s in their interest to look like heros and “clean” the sport up.
Trash sport run by trash.
...apparently Mr Armstrong was so concentrated on his work, that he forgot "diplomacy". Maybe he refused to render kickbacks.
Whatever it was, he clearly annoyed some of the "officials" in this organization.
Lance Armstrong has enhance more lives and saved more lives than all of the "officals" in the UCI and USADA combined.
....I'll go with Lance...these other people can go to hell.
“Let’s for the sake of argument say that Armstrong was a walking pharmasy the whole time he was winning bike races.”
It’s not just that he doped but apparently he told other players that if they didn’t dope themselves, they wouldn’t be in the team.
They could go after Barry Bonds if they wanted to and I don’t think too many people would shed tears.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.