Ok, explain this to me: Just HOW is he comparing WOMEN to dogs? As far as I can tell, he was using an analogy to describe McCaskill’s term in DC? And would I call McCaskill a dog? HELL YA! She is one mangy beech!
If Missouri women are so friggin’ stupid that they take the comment as a personal affront, and it costs Akin the election, then we here in Missouri get what we deserve by having McCaskill re-elected.
On a more general note, I just have to say, a lot of people who aren’t from Missouri sure do have a lot of disparaging things to say about Akin. He may not be the most politically correct, or suave politician. He his miles better for Missouri, and the country, than the alternative. Why don’t you all shut the hell up, if you can’t support us in our attempt to get rid of her?
Akin is the candidate, deal with it, and stop trying to drag us down. For those of us who didn’t vote for him in the primary, it’s hard enough as it is.
Oh, its the same as the “files of women” comment that Romney made in the last debate... the dims conflate the comment so as to create a straw man argument, same as always. Why folks pay more attention to the fluff of a campaign than the hard cold facts on the ground, (i.e., the bankrupting of America, finically, militarily and socially) is simply maddening...
And would I call McCaskill a dog? HELL YA! She is one mangy beech!