Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hedgetrimmer; Fai Mao

>> “Banning the use of GM foods” <<

Banning? - Not in the proposition!

Only the transfer of knowledge, and a legal guarantee thereof is contained in the proposition.

.
It appears that Fai Mao has some interest here that he has not disclosed.

Monsanto, Dupont? - Or a farmer that has already destroyed his own land?

What is your interest here, why are you lying?


99 posted on 10/22/2012 8:44:55 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
Monsanto, Dupont? - Or a farmer that has already destroyed his own land?

Interesting how you mention DuPont. Remember when they rigged the banning of their own product (freon) "just to keep you safe"? Feeling better with HCFC instead? You know it is more toxic. This will work the same way, exactly the way it did with Prop 65.

101 posted on 10/22/2012 8:48:55 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Islam offers us choices: convert or kill, submit or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor

The Organic food movement does want to ban any type of GM food

When I spoke of billions starving I was speaking of the world’s population not California

The proponents of this bill may call it labeling but the intent is to make foods that are not organic so expensive that they cannot be produced.

I have no stock in Monsanto - I did grow up on a farm

I also said they should not be immune from monopolistic practices.

The organic( non-GM food is a branch of that)is like many other things from the left a movement founded on 1/2 truth.


178 posted on 10/23/2012 11:15:47 PM PDT by Fai Mao (Genius at Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson