Not sure I can stomach Lindsey Graham, but he will probably talk about Benghazi. Line ups on the other programs seem geared to the election.
Obama has secret talks with Iran. Or he doesn't.
Dueling announcements coming soon:
Alread’s announcement vs Trump's announcement.
[I am holding my breath. Yeah, right.]
With many versions and several re-versions of the Benghazi story, Romney should have plenty of ammo for tomorrow night's debate -- if Schieffer doesn't keep interrupting and trying to change the subject.
==
Chris Wallace pre-FNS promo on F&F: Romney got messed up on the Benghazi response in the debate.
[What???? Did Wallace have his head in the sand? Crowley was the one who messed up. Romney was correct that Obama did NOT call the Benghazi attack 'terrorism' until days later.]
I don't know what Wallace had in mind, but my sense was that Romney was thrown off balance by Crowley's finding that Obama did say, on September 12th, that the Benghazi attack was an act of terrorism. To his credit, Romney repeated his incredulity in the words "not a spontaneous attack?", which takes the focus off defining the word "terrorism."
Carney (and probably Obama) want to have the issue both ways, where they justify calling the attack terrorism on account of all attacks are terrorism; and at the same time, claim that the attack was a spontaneous uprising in reaction to a mock-Mohammad movie.
I don't think "having it both ways" as a means of winning debate points plays well among thinking voters, the 53%.