Replies

I am sorry but it’s not a mutually exclusive thing here, that because this is reported on somehow means everyone’s forgotten or not outraged by deaths of people. You have to stop using arguments like this because they are specious. People can be outraged by both types of cruelty (and lets be clear Hillary isn’t to blame, Obama personally was involved in sending this guy over there on this trip, on top of already picking him personally to be ambassador). Plus there are the actual people that murdered the ambassador that deserve blame as well. But how are you or anyone else going to know about any of it if it isn’t reported.

I believe that is how you interpret this. We can’t report and express anger at any lesser accounts of evil unless we deal with those others think have to be dealt with first? We’ll get no agreement because everyone’s idea of what should be dealt with first is different.

I read the story and just see yet another example of how cruelty comes so natural to people, it’s innate in our natures. Nobody has to learn how to be evil or mean. It does take a lot of work and time to learn how to be good.

And you ought to well know it’s good to know about these people, they are the types that progress onto torturing and murdering innocent people.

Sure people are frustrated other things they feel are being overlooked are getting away without justice, but that doesn’t mean we let all the lesser evils just skate by until the larger ones are dealt with. Some stuff will take time to get justice, some will not have justice until after death facing God. You gotta realize sometimes that’s how things work out. Be angry about it, but use the anger to do something positive about it. There’s no reason you can’t get involved with groups whose mission it is to make sure people that you think need to answer for things, do, in the here and now. Judicial Watch, Liberty Counsel, local conservative groups, etc.