Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gaffer

The 7 years figure I saw in a libertarian pub during the Carter years, I am sure it’s an average which may be based also on the rate of inflation (which was bad during then!) subtracting value from the money taken. I made an assumption that it might be less then 7 years now because these kind of things never get better!

Do you deny the statement that social security money taken would be better off privately invested and you would be better off financially then the the present system?


18 posted on 10/20/2012 8:19:49 AM PDT by Reily (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Reily

No, I’d be more than happy for them to give me my $100K back (and give my employer back his $100K) and we part ways.

It is a corrupt system that allows minimal contributors to receive far more than they’ve paid in. It allows naturalized citizens’ parents to qualify (working only 10 years, usually in a family business paying minimum wage on the books and then more cash under the table)....we are inundated with immigrant anchor relatives sucking the blood out of it. We are inundated with cheaters and users. I’d just soon as see it abolished alltogether myself.


20 posted on 10/20/2012 8:26:26 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson