IF Obama can win re-election with the country in this shape, people should be VERY afraid; I’ve told myself that it just isn’t possible. Rush is right that Obama should be in the 70% range due to all the work his media is doing for him; if the media is just going to pick our leaders anyway then it is at open war with the American people (as Obama clearly already is).
I hope I’m not kidding myself when I say this election won’t even be close; Romney should be coasting to an easy win.
Prison. The only solution is to seek imprisonment for treason for all of them.
The members of the mainstream American media are certainly enemy combatants in the Cold Civil War.
I didn’t see that. What is your source of information?
You would think the above three reasons would give it to Romney by at least 60%. .
Regardless of the election results, IMPEACHMENT proceedings against Obama should begin immediately.
Romney accepted these moderators, he decided to go after this highly vunerable area of O and so he should have done his homework and have known that O made this statement and then nuked Obama in response to Crowley and Os responses:
Here:
O :” I said it was an act of terrorism on day one ”
R :” Yes, and on day two to day 21 you and your staff told the public it was a mobs reaction to a youtube video. You just admitted you knew you were lying all those days. Thank you for the rare honest admission Mr President even if it was unintentional. ”
BOOM!
As I said many many times before, whining is not winning. Dems see the whining and interpret it correctly as an admission of losing.
Brett Baur doing a special RIGHT now on this on FNC (10pm EST), "Special Report Investigation : Death and Deceit in Benghazi. ".
Not to mention the sabre rattling with China and Japan. not one word...they’re still talking about *binders*.
” - - - Crowley repeated the lie.”
And that is how the phrase “to Crowley a debate” began.
From the article:
"An old-time political hand in D.C., whom I know and who has advised and worked on many campaigns, is utterly convinced that the exchange was a setup of Romney by the Obama campaign and Crowley. I agree, based on the principle all lawyers know: never ask a question in the courtroom to which you don’t know the answer. After Romney argued that it took weeks for the Obama administration to admit that terrorism was involved, Obama claimed he had mentioned it the day after the attack, looked at Crowley, and asked her to “get the transcript.” Whereupon Crowley immediately responded “he [Obama] did in fact. So let me call it an act of terror.”
Yes that is a good question. Of course it is merely a way to get yourself published based on a shocking headline. The leftist moderators have “suceeded” in giving Romney the momentum and not much more.