Posted on 10/19/2012 6:29:16 PM PDT by trappedincanuckistan
Shortly after Obamacare was passed and signed by the President, Michael Tanner of the Cato Institute noted a sudden plethora of articles that had begun to appear in a wide variety of MSM outlets about the probable ill-effects of "reform." This prompted him to ask, "Where were these reporters before the passage of the health care bill?" The answer to this question is now pretty obvious. They were colluding, via JournoList and other such forums that we don't know about, to make sure that no one screwed up and told the truth before that morass of taxes and regulations became the law of the land. To the nation's cost, their self-censorship succeeded.
Today, we face a similar but much more dangerous situation. The "reporters" of the establishment news media are engaged in a concerted campaign of misinformation to get Barack Obama re-elected. This has been evident for some time, but the breathtaking mendacity of this effort was writ large by Candy Crowley during last Tuesday's presidential debate. Everyone has by now seen the video clip: the President made the preposterous claim that he had identified the attack on our Benghazi consulate as an act of terrorism as early as September 12. Then, when Romney called him on this egregious whopper, Crowley repeated the lie.
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
IF Obama can win re-election with the country in this shape, people should be VERY afraid; I’ve told myself that it just isn’t possible. Rush is right that Obama should be in the 70% range due to all the work his media is doing for him; if the media is just going to pick our leaders anyway then it is at open war with the American people (as Obama clearly already is).
I hope I’m not kidding myself when I say this election won’t even be close; Romney should be coasting to an easy win.
I agree. With the economy in the toilet, and the foreign policy disasters it’s downright scary Obama will get 45%.
Prison. The only solution is to seek imprisonment for treason for all of them.
they already know how to handle those long lines that will be occurring all over the country on Nov 6.
Americans CAN'T WAIT to vote this bass turd out!
The members of the mainstream American media are certainly enemy combatants in the Cold Civil War.
A year ago I was posting that they’d find a reason (health?) for Obama to avoid running for re-election; I couldn’t believe even back then that he had a prayer of winning. Before he focused on Republicans, he spent a lot of time and effort putting down any attempts in his own party to replace him on the ballot.
This goes beyond the regular ignorance of many Americans; this is a concerted effort (along the lines of Red China or the Soviets) to so carefully restrict the flow of information to citizens it is frightening.
I didn’t see that. What is your source of information?
About the embassies?
“Americans CAN’T WAIT to vote this bass turd out!”
Everything I’ve seen (especially the elections held since The Sultan ascended the throne) indicates that this is the case; how does the media get back on the air the day after the election if this is a landslide win for Romney?
You would think the above three reasons would give it to Romney by at least 60%. .
“IF Obama can win re-election with the country in this shape, people should be VERY afraid;”
I would beg to differ. If Obama can win re-election with the country in this shape, people should be very ashamed.
Yes. Which ones were under attack?
The members of the mainstream American media are certainly enemy combatants in the Cold Civil War.
Not positive. The author says it in the article, but it is not sourced. About a week ago I read somewhere that American embassies around the world were being attacked and that it wasn’t being reported, but I don’t remember where I read it. I’ll do some google searching tonight.
Thanks! If this can be verified, it would be yet another indictment of the MSM covering for Obama at the expense of our country’s security—nothing short of treasonous.
Regardless of the election results, IMPEACHMENT proceedings against Obama should begin immediately.
Romney accepted these moderators, he decided to go after this highly vunerable area of O and so he should have done his homework and have known that O made this statement and then nuked Obama in response to Crowley and Os responses:
Here:
O : I said it was an act of terrorism on day one
R : Yes, and on day two to day 21 you and your staff told the public it was a mobs reaction to a youtube video. You just admitted you knew you were lying all those days. Thank you for the rare honest admission Mr President even if it was unintentional.
BOOM!
As I said many many times before, whining is not winning. Dems see the whining and interpret it correctly as an admission of losing.
Brett Baur doing a special RIGHT now on this on FNC (10pm EST), "Special Report Investigation : Death and Deceit in Benghazi. ".
“If Obama can win re-election with the country in this shape, people should be very ashamed.”
What can you expect from people who are constantly bombarded with lies? I expect people to use their own 2 eyes to tell them what is going on, but I know that too many people are too trusting (or simply stupid).
There was a reason why during his rise to power Mussolini repeatedly burned down the offices of the communist newspapers; they were a cancer that he (and much of Europe) saw as the true threat to their way of life that they actually represented.
I think I may have read it a week or so ago in The Washington Times. Not positive though. Gonna do some investigating.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.