Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The tea party is helping Democrats
Washington Post ^ | October 19, 2012 | by Dana Milbank

Posted on 10/19/2012 11:30:14 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

There are those who say that the tea party is fading in influence, but nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, the movement is on the cusp of achieving what once seemed nearly impossible: keeping the Senate Democratic.

A year ago, famed political handicapper Charlie Cook gave Republicans a 60 percent to 70 percent likelihood of capturing control of the Senate; now, he tells me the likelihood of it remaining Democratic is 60 percent.

The switch in fortunes can be attributed to many causes — a slate of lackluster Republican candidates high among them — but one thing is beyond serious dispute: If not for a series of tea party upsets in Republican primaries, the Republicans would be taking over the Senate majority in January.

There is a deep irony here: The tea party faithful, who claimed they wanted to shake up Washington, have wound up perpetuating the old system. In fighting for ideological purity in primaries regardless of the consequences, they have set back their own cause of limited government and expanded freedom.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012issues; charliecook; election2012; influence; milbank; teaparty; wishfulthinking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: 2banana
Getting rid of RINOs is not a vice.

The Doobie Brothers said it well:


61 posted on 10/19/2012 1:07:02 PM PDT by Night Hides Not (The Tea Party was the earthquake, and Chick Fil A the tsunami...100's of aftershocks to come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rhinohunter
You mean tea-party candidates like Thompson and Allen? /sarc

LOL! Tell it to Cruz and Mourdock!

62 posted on 10/19/2012 1:08:41 PM PDT by Night Hides Not (The Tea Party was the earthquake, and Chick Fil A the tsunami...100's of aftershocks to come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
For the most part the party is not splintered that much. If it were, we would not be winning elections and we have been winning elections.

Two races in the whole scheme of things means very little. We are all Republicans and we must remain united in our desire to defeat Democrats--they are the enemy.

63 posted on 10/19/2012 1:09:56 PM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I know nothing about the man who beat her and that is not necessarily relevant. At any rate, she did not win and she came across as a kook. She did no one any good. I like the William F. Buckley method—choose the most conservative—WHO CAN WIN.


64 posted on 10/19/2012 1:13:41 PM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Here you go

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2616638/posts


65 posted on 10/19/2012 1:15:44 PM PDT by Perdogg (Vote like the US Constitution depends on it - it does!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
But she didn't actually come across as a kook ~ certainly no more than the guy who won.

You have to learn to make your own judgments based on what you see and hear from the candidate and what their enemies say.

The Washington Post, owned and operated mostly by mostly gay people, didn't like her.

66 posted on 10/19/2012 1:17:06 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

Yes, he does. He’s coming from behind to beat double-dealing Casey, who last time told the pro-lifers he was pro-life and NARAL he wasn’t. NARAL endorsed him. I saw some of them on the street with a Casey table and said “Why are you endorsing this pro-lifer?” and they took the signs down.

Smith has the coal miners too, and everyone who supports them in this very pro-union state.


67 posted on 10/19/2012 1:17:21 PM PDT by firebrand (Beware of wishful thinking--the mousetrap of small minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

To clarify, the table was for various pro-aborts.

Also, Casey is running on his father’s name. Some people may even think they’re voting for Casey Sr.


68 posted on 10/19/2012 1:20:09 PM PDT by firebrand (Beware of wishful thinking--the mousetrap of small minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
So, you have a problem with which one?

He actually sounds quite prophetic ~ particularly about being a danger to the nation.

69 posted on 10/19/2012 1:20:21 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

I’m a Tea Partier and I am fully behind all the Republicans this election.

After we get rid of 0bama, we can worry about getting rid of RINOs.

Though I can only speak for myself, the other Tea Partiers I’ve talked with have pretty much the same attitude. I’m sure there are a few Tea Partiers who will vote third party. So will some Democrats and Republicans. But I think most of the noise about Tea Partiers voting third party or not voting is wishful thinking coming from Democrats and trolls.


70 posted on 10/19/2012 1:28:47 PM PDT by generally (Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Even though I live a long way away, I saw replays of her ad. It was devastating. I have no idea if another Republican could have won the election but there had to be someone better than O’Donnell.


71 posted on 10/19/2012 1:42:58 PM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Actually, he’s got it upside down.

The “tea party” is the GOP rank and file. The people who most hate the tea party (which is to say, their own membership) are what we used to call “Rockefeller Republicans” and what we now like to call Rinos and GOPe. I believe they hate the rank and file Republicans more than the Democrats do.

And the Repubs who most viciously attacked us almost always turned out to be romniacs. This is one of several reasons so many of us wanted nothing to do with Romney. We mistrusted him due to his record, but viscerally disliked the kind of people who were quickest to rally to him.

But just as we have found it necessary to offer him our support, he has found that he needs it. So, Romney, a qualified yes. Romniacs, no. They can still take a flying leap.


72 posted on 10/19/2012 1:52:10 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Milktoast remembers the thousands upon thousands of Tea Partiers that were at the Washington Mall. The thousands and thousands that attended Tea Party Rallies all over the United States. A true grass roots movement. People anxious to save our Country from the obamatrocity. He is scared of the impact that a revved up Tea Party can have on an election. See 2010 for an example.


73 posted on 10/19/2012 1:52:50 PM PDT by Dave278 (Keep your change I will keep my freedom!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
That wasn't her only ad, and it's not even an ad she wanted to make ~ in the background was a different issue ~ and locally somebody thought it had to be dealt with.

I live in the same broadcast area.

You have to remember something about Delaware, Joe Biden got elected from there and to win you must usually be a Democrat, or have had significant brain surgery, or be gay with a cousin or two working as thugs for the unions ~ oh, yeah, and be IN TIGHT with the shore community real estate and tourist industry (which are all the same thing there)

The odds were against her.

74 posted on 10/19/2012 1:55:09 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I noticed at the time that she lost with about the same percentages as some other Repubs down ticket. Which means, the ad didn’t make any difference for or against.


75 posted on 10/19/2012 1:58:32 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Spot on and GOP enthusiasm continues to trend up


76 posted on 10/19/2012 2:00:46 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: marron

Absolutamundocorrect! The ad made no difference. They been voting Democrat there for centuries ~ still POd about losing they’s slaves too.


77 posted on 10/19/2012 2:01:44 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Wrong on 2 levels.

First, the ‘scapegoat’ shtick is the liberal Democrats and liberal pundits in the lib-media.

Second, the election is not over yet, and in fact Romney is on track for a big win and his coattails will bring in a GOP Senate majority.

This is more lib-Media PsyOps to make the right nervous and divided. Dont believe it.

They wanted to defeat Tea Party Republican Allen West, but latest poll has him up 9 points.

Tea party Republicans Mourdock in Indiana and Cruz in Texas will win. So will Heller in NV. Akin was toast but has come back to 50/50 shot. Tom Smith in PA is within the MOE.

we may indeed fall short but dont let liberal pundits get to you and cause this circular firing squad - its PsyOps.


78 posted on 10/19/2012 2:03:25 PM PDT by WOSG (REPEAL AND REPLACE OBAMA. He stole AmericaÂ’s promise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: generally
No, Conservatives ~ REAL Conservatives ~ have a problem with any and all people who aren't real Republicans running under a Republican party label.

Trolls and Democrats don't care.

79 posted on 10/19/2012 2:06:06 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I am sure you are right but she should never have been the candidate in order to get optimal chance at success of defeating the RAT.


80 posted on 10/19/2012 2:09:29 PM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson